LANTERNS: Possible Trailer Description Reveals Hal Jordan's Fully Practical INJUSTICE-Inspired Costume

@slickrickdesigns - what we got in moonknight

@NonPlayerC - yep. That’s one of the things I’m definitely not a fan of!

@TheVisionary25 - I read the GL and GA run of Denny O'Neil and Neal Adams this year, i find a little odd to make a murder mistery with Hal and John instead of Hal and Ollie like in the comics, but they will probably have the same chemistry as Hal and Ollie / John, since it is apparently an introduction to John to the Lantern Corps they probably won't thrust each other at first and will be bickering the whole time but if Hal doesn't dies or turns into Parallax they will be the bro's who trusts each other completely but still doesn't agree with everything

@Bucky74 - I wonder why they dont make the antagonist a Muslim group shooting, raping, driving cars into crowds, etc.? I guess that's too far fetched for DC. That stuff never happens in the real world...

@Bucky74 - Why am I not surprised your genocidal Zionist ass is spreading Islamophobic comments lol 😆 What’s wild is how predictable this tantrum is.

A show uses right-wing extremists as antagonists, an objectively real phenomenon with documented attacks, arrests, and deaths attached to it, and suddenly it is “propaganda.” But when you fantasize about Muslims as default villains, you call that “reality.” That alone tells everyone exactly where this is coming from.

You keep saying “invisible white supremacists,” yet the FBI, DHS, Europol, and basically every domestic terrorism report for the last decade all disagree with you. They are not invisible. You are just committed to not seeing them.

And the irony is that DC has always been political. Green Lantern, Watchmen, Superman, these were never neutral punch-the-bad-guy-and-shut-up stories. They tackled fascism, McCarthyism, Cold War paranoia, police power, and imperialism. The difference now is that you are the one being criticized, so you mistake discomfort for an agenda.

Your “why not Muslims?” comment is not a brave truth bomb. It is lazy bigotry. You are not asking for realism. You are asking for confirmation of your prejudices. Realism does not mean recycling cable news talking points into scripts.

The funniest part is you whining about “actual comic supervillains” while missing the entire point that extremist ideology turning towns into pressure cookers is the supervillain. That is literally what grounded sci-fi has always done.

So no, this is not DC pushing a message. It is DC telling a story that does not flatter you, and you are calling that oppression.

If a TV show makes you feel this personally attacked, maybe the problem is not HBO.

@ElBlancoChoco - you missed the word fundamental. But you keep spouting that utter shite. It's like saying all Irish are IRA

@Shmokey20 - No Jew-hating Nazi, I'm spreading FACTS. This is what you support: https://nypost.com/2025/12/14/world-news/australia-shooting-at-famed-sydney-bondi-beach/

Lol, really? Where are these invisible "right-wing" extremists? Were they the ones burning down cities and killing dozens in the 2020 riots? Did they assassinate Kirk and attempt to assassinate the President? What about the Brown shooting that killed the head of the Republican club?

Yes, it's blatant propaganda intended to make the simple-minded do exactly what you are doing, see white supremacists that don't exist everywhere. But like the superheroes, it's all fake in 2025. There are probably about 10 actual white supremacists drinking beer somewhere in a pickup and complaining who are no real threat to anyone. Meanwhile, Antifa terrorists have firebombed cities and injured thousands. I get it, you are so into the TV world you believe everything it tells you. But reality is vastly different

@AliX - And you're number 1 when it comes to terrorist attacks and urban crime, and murder. Those are facts. Also, according to the FBI, the vast majority of hate crimes are committed by minorities.

@Bucky74 - the others on here can't accept fact over fiction. Just reading thru the brainwashed comments on here makes me realize the media and school systems have completely taken away any common sense. They only benefit of that is that they will welcome savages into their lives without any hesitation and will reap the "benefits" of that.

@ElBlancoChoco - Spot on. London is a great example of when political correctness trumps (pun intended) reality and our survival instinct.

@ElBlancoChoco & @Bucky74 - You keep yelling “facts,” but what you are actually doing is throwing unrelated events, distortions, and outright falsehoods into a pile and calling it reality.

Let’s start with the basics. Right wing extremism is not “invisible.” It is documented by law enforcement, courts, and sentencing records. People are in prison for it. Groups have been dismantled for it. Plots have been stopped for it. That is not opinion, that is record. Denying it does not make it disappear, it just signals that you refuse to acknowledge anything that contradicts your worldview.

You keep pointing to riots, crime, or individual acts of violence and pretending they somehow erase ideologically motivated extremism on the right. That is not how reality works. Multiple things can exist at the same time. Civil unrest, crime, religious extremism, and far right political violence are not mutually exclusive categories. Pretending one cancels out the others is not logic, it is deflection.

Your attempt to reframe every act of violence by a white extremist as “just crime” while assigning ideology to every act committed by a minority is the clearest example of bad faith possible. You are not analyzing patterns. You are assigning motives selectively based on who you already dislike.

The “Antifa burned down cities” line has been debunked so many times it is embarrassing to still repeat it. Cities were not firebombed into oblivion. They still exist. The vast majority of people arrested during unrest were not members of any organized extremist group. You confuse chaos, opportunism, and crime with coordinated ideological terrorism because it suits your narrative.

The claim that white supremacists barely exist is flatly false. The claim that they pose no threat is flatly false. The claim that minorities commit the vast majority of hate crimes is also false, and even when hate crimes are committed by minorities, that does not magically erase the existence of ideologically driven white nationalist violence. Again, reality is not a zero sum game.

Calling everyone who disagrees with you a Nazi, brainwashed, or a “useful idiot” is not strength. It is what people do when they cannot defend their arguments without emotional outbursts and conspiracy thinking. You accuse others of being controlled by media while repeating the exact same talking points, word for word, that have circulated in partisan echo chambers for years.

Your comments about entire religions and populations are not “truth telling.” They are collective punishment logic. The same logic extremists use. The irony would be funny if it were not so transparent.

As for comics and superheroes, this might be the most ironic part of all. These stories have always confronted power, extremism, propaganda, and authoritarian thinking. The only difference now is that you recognize yourself in the critique and you do not like it. That is not propaganda. That is self recognition.

If your worldview requires pretending documented threats do not exist, rewriting crime statistics to fit your politics, and dehumanizing entire groups of people, then the problem is not TV shows, movies, or media literacy.

The problem is that reality refuses to bend to your narrative, and instead of adapting, you lash out.

That is not courage. That is insecurity dressed up as outrage.

@Bucky74 - You are accidentally proving the exact point you keep refusing to understand.

Yes, antisemitism is real. Yes, Jews have been targeted, historically and today, simply for being Jewish. Yes, there are people and groups who openly want Jews wiped off the map. None of that is disputed, minimized, or excused by me. Acknowledging antisemitism does not require denying reality elsewhere.

But here is where your argument collapses.

You correctly identify that it is wrong to take the actions of extremists and project them onto all Jews. You understand that collective blame is dangerous, dishonest, and historically catastrophic. You recognize that when people excuse hatred of Jews as “just facts,” it leads to violence.

Then you turn around and do the exact same thing to Muslims and minorities.

You take extremist violence committed by some, and you describe an entire religion as a violent cult. You speak about whole populations as “savages.” You demand they be treated as default villains in media and politics. That is not analysis. That is the same logic used against Jews for centuries, just aimed at a different target.

You cannot argue that antisemitism is real and evil while defending Islamophobia as realism. You cannot condemn dehumanization of Jews while openly dehumanizing Muslims and minorities. Either collective guilt is wrong, or it is not. You do not get to apply that principle only when it protects people you care about.

You keep saying “facts,” but facts do not require stripping people of humanity. Facts do not require pretending one form of extremism exists while another does not. Facts do not require rewriting reality so that every crime by a minority is ideological and every crime by a white extremist is just a lone bad actor or imaginary.

And blaming “the Left” for hatred of Jews while excusing or promoting hatred of Muslims is not moral clarity. It is selective outrage driven by identity politics, not evidence.

If you truly care about Jews being targeted for who they are, then you should understand exactly why your rhetoric about Muslims is dangerous. You are using the same framing that antisemites use, just with different nouns.

That is not standing against hate.

That is choosing which hate you are comfortable with.

@Bucky74 - You are still doing the same thing, just dressing it up with geopolitical language.

Hamas is a terrorist organization. Hamas commits war crimes. Hamas abuses civilians, steals aid, and rules Gaza through violence. None of that is controversial. None of that has ever been denied here.

What is being challenged is your insistence on turning Hamas into a stand in for Muslims as a whole or Palestinians as a whole, and then calling that “basic reality.”

It is not factually correct to describe the “vast majority of Muslims” as aligned with genocidal extremism. That is not reality. That is collective blame. That is the exact same mental shortcut used by people who have justified violence against Jews by pointing to selective examples and declaring them representative.

You keep invoking Jewish survival, which is real and serious, while refusing to acknowledge that Palestinians are also human beings who do not become legitimate targets by default because Hamas exists. You cannot claim moral clarity while erasing civilian distinction. International law exists precisely because “they are ruled by terrorists” has historically been used to justify atrocities against entire populations.

You say Israel is fighting Hamas. Fine. Then talk about Hamas. But you do not do that. You talk about Muslims. You talk about entire regions. You talk about cultures as inherently violent. That shift is not accidental. It is ideological.

The phrase “from the river to the sea” can be antisemitic in some contexts and genocidal when used that way. It can also be used by people calling for equal rights or an end to occupation. Pretending every use of it means extermination of Jews while simultaneously flattening every Palestinian grievance into terrorism is dishonest and convenient.

You also keep claiming that peace will magically appear once Hamas is eliminated, as if decades of displacement, occupation, blockade, and statelessness simply do not exist. That belief is not realism. It is fantasy. Extremism does not grow in a vacuum, and killing one group does not erase the conditions that produced it.

Here is the core issue you refuse to face.

You understand why Jews cannot be judged collectively for the actions of extremists. You understand why that logic is dangerous and has led to genocide. Yet you insist on applying that same logic to Muslims and Palestinians and calling it truth.

That is not consistency. That is tribalism.

You do not get to claim the moral high ground against antisemitism while promoting Islamophobia and racialized dehumanization. You do not get to call others propagandized while repeating a worldview where one group is eternally innocent and another is eternally suspect.

If your argument requires denying the humanity of millions of people to function, then the problem is not that others “deny reality.”

It is that your version of reality is built on exclusion, fear, and selective empathy.

@Shmokey20 - https://nypost.com/2025/12/17/us-news/jewish-new-yorker-stabbed-just-centimeters-from-his-heart-in-antisemitic-attack/

The attacks against Jews just don’t stop!

@Shmokey20 - So, basically, in your estimation, nothing means anything and all of these tens of thousands of terrorist attacks, the constant threat of attack, and the thousands and thousands killed, really mean nothing unless “Israel” and “Jews” got it. I think you need to take a deep long look into your soul and evaluate why you feel that way.

@Bucky74 - This is exactly the tactic you have been using from the beginning, and it is transparent.

At no point did I say that antisemitic attacks “mean nothing.” At no point did I deny Jewish suffering, violence against Jews, or the very real rise in antisemitism. You keep accusing me of that because it allows you to avoid engaging with what I am actually saying.

Condemning antisemitism does not require endorsing collective punishment, Islamophobia, or the erasure of Palestinian civilians. Those are not the same thing, no matter how badly you want them to be.

You are doing something deeply dishonest here. You take real antisemitic violence, which absolutely must be condemned, and you use it as a shield to justify hatred of Muslims, minorities, and anyone who criticizes Israeli state policy. That is not defending Jews. That is instrumentalizing Jewish suffering to shut down moral scrutiny elsewhere.

Antisemitism is real. Violent antisemitism is rising. That deserves outrage, protection, and accountability. Full stop.

But here is the part you refuse to accept.

Opposing antisemitism does not obligate anyone to support every action of the Israeli government. Opposing Hamas does not obligate anyone to dehumanize Palestinians. Acknowledging Islamist extremism does not justify treating Muslims as a civilizational threat. These are separate issues, and collapsing them together is how serious discussion dies.

Your NY Post opinion piece does not prove what you think it proves. It highlights genuine antisemitic incidents, which should be condemned without hesitation. What it does not do is establish that all anti Zionism is antisemitism, that Muslims are uniquely violent, or that civilian suffering is irrelevant unless Jews are the victims.

You keep framing this as if there are only two options. Either one fully adopts your worldview, or one secretly hates Jews. That is emotional blackmail, not argumentation.

And the irony is hard to miss. You rightly demand that Jews not be collectively blamed for the actions of extremists. Yet you insist on collectively blaming Muslims, protesters, entire regions, and anyone who dissents from your politics. You want a moral rule that applies only in one direction.

That is not moral clarity. That is selective empathy.

If you truly care about Jewish safety, then you should understand why dehumanization, collective guilt, and civilizational panic are dangerous tools. They have never protected Jews in the long run. They have only expanded the circle of hate.

I can condemn antisemitism unequivocally and still reject Islamophobia. I can oppose Hamas and still insist that Palestinian civilians are human beings. I can call out extremist violence without turning entire populations into suspects.

If that level of nuance feels threatening to you, the problem is not my “soul.”
It is that your worldview cannot tolerate moral consistency unless it points in one direction only.

And that is not reality. That is fear dressed up as righteousness.