Doctor Who Expected To Be Gone Until At Least 2028 - And Why "Identity Politics" Led To Cancellation

Doctor Who Expected To Be Gone Until At Least 2028 - And Why "Identity Politics" Led To Cancellation

A new report reveals that Doctor Who could be off our screens for the next half a decade, especially as interest in the series from production partners simply isn't there right now.

By JoshWilding - Jun 11, 2026 08:06 PM EST
Filed Under: Doctor Who
Source: SFFGazette.com

Yesterday, the news broke that the BBC has parted ways with Doctor Who showrunner Russell T Davies and production company Bad Wolf. The planned Christmas Special has been scrapped, and the Time Lord is now in limbo as the British broadcaster puts the show on a competitive tender.

That will see the BBC ask producers to "pitch in a bake-off-style process to regenerate the sci-fi series," explains Deadline (via SFFGazette.com). However, the prospect isn't generating much in the way of enthusiasm after Disney+'s failed partnership with the channel. 

The streamer came on board to help give Doctor Who a big-budget overhaul and bring the show to a global audience. Ultimately, it was deemed a poor investment, and Disney+ exited the partnership as soon as possible. 

According to four "respected UK drama producers" the trade spoke to, all have "serious reservations" about stepping into the TARDIS. From a business perspective, sinking time and money into a franchise still owned by the BBC doesn't make sense. That's what Disney did, and the show ultimately failed to make an impact in terms of viewership or subscription numbers.

One producer said, "You would have to be mad" to take on Doctor Who, with another adding, "[It’s a] bit of a nightmare for any producer in this market with the shadow of the Disney fallout."

"It’s hard to see another major U.S. studio replacing Disney. So the budget would be hard to get above £3M ($4M) [per episode] without significant co-pro or insane investment from the distribution arm [BBC Studios], which they will struggle to recoup on sales."

Others feel that the show has lost its way creatively, with Davies blamed for using a "sledgehammer" to tackle issues of diversity and inclusion. His glib attitude about Doctor Who's future has drawn widespread backlash, particularly as he recently teased an exciting update that proved to be anything but. 

According to insiders, Davies' ousting was "mutual," as everyone realised "Doctor Who required a level of surgery that could not be masked by the sticking plaster of a festive episode." There are conflicting claims about how much the showrunner had actually written, though it was likely only announced to calm concerns about the series being scrapped when Disney+ walked away.

Unfortunately, this all means that Doctor Who won't be back until 2028 at the earliest. However, even that is "considered an outside bet," with one producer believing that it could be gone for at least five years until 2031. 

The UK tabloids have also weighed in, with The Telegraph talking to a former writer who told them, "We had this nonsense, this identity politics, and there is nothing less likely to make people feel at ease than by making them think they are being hectored or lectured." 

A source told The Times, "The show doesn't necessarily need money, but it needs a rethink and perhaps an abandonment of the preachiness we have seen recently," with another former writer stating, "It will inevitably return at some point, but first it needs a very long rest. At the moment Doctor Who is a toxic brand."

Keep checking back here for updates on Doctor Who as we have them.

About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
Comic Book Reader. Film Lover. WWE and F1 Fan. Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and ComicBookMovie.com's #1 contributor.
Doctor Who: Russell T Davies On Leaving The Series And Whether He Was Casting The Next Time Lord
Related:

Doctor Who: Russell T Davies On Leaving The Series And Whether He Was Casting The Next Time Lord

Doctor Who 2026 Christmas Special Scrapped As BBC Seeks New Creative Team And Production Partner
Recommended For You:

Doctor Who 2026 Christmas Special Scrapped As BBC Seeks New Creative Team And Production Partner

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, Comic Book Movie is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. Comic Book Movie will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that Comic Book Movie, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
theFUZZ008
theFUZZ008 - 6/11/2026, 8:23 PM
RTD really [frick]ed it up.
Batmangina
Batmangina - 6/11/2026, 8:31 PM
Are you saying the CIS HET statistically normative population of The Earth doesn't want everything they watch to be DEI Double Dipped and shoved up their collective one way street?

User Comment Image

So you're saying that the 7.9 billion non gay/trans/enby/queer assholes are the ones that ruined it for everyone else.

User Comment Image

JUST KIDDING

User Comment Image
DocSpock
DocSpock - 6/11/2026, 10:30 PM
@Batmangina -

You got that right Napolean.
theFUZZ008
theFUZZ008 - 6/12/2026, 8:53 AM
@Batmangina - This really made me laugh. Cheers.
Batmangina
Batmangina - 6/12/2026, 9:59 AM
@DocSpock - User Comment Image
Batmangina
Batmangina - 6/12/2026, 9:59 AM
@theFUZZ008 - User Comment Image
RockReigns
RockReigns - 6/11/2026, 8:39 PM
Crazy to think that we went from The Doctor showing Vincent Van Gogh the impact he had on this planet to... this.

Doctor Who deserved better.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 6/11/2026, 8:45 PM
I don’t know if the Doctor Who brand is as toxic as one of the commenters in the article is making it out to be but it is fair to say I think that The Reality War left a bad taste to an extent in a fair amount of people’s mouth…

Honestly before that , I was hearing & seeing mostly praise for RTD’s second era with Ncuti (I myself still like it overall though acknowledge its flaws) but that’s when I feel this current “negativity” for lack of a better word emerged but maybe I’m wrong.

Also , I don’t think RTD was all that heavy handed with the “identity politics” especially compared to Chibnall’s run which would sometimes even spell out the message of the episode within the dialogue but oh well…

I do think Doctor Who being shelved for a bit is a good thing since there’s I higher chance I feel it comes back with a fresh energy in 3-5 years time hopefully so fingers crossed!!.
XRayCat
XRayCat - 6/11/2026, 8:49 PM
The regressive left has a talent for taking something beautiful and destroying it. It's a reflection of their own twisted and one-dimensional mindsets. Then they point the blame at the audience who wasn't receptive.

They've ruined several legendary franchises from Star Wars to Indiana Jones.
DarthOmega
DarthOmega - 6/11/2026, 9:27 PM
@XRayCat - It's done so often it feels like that's the whole point. I remember hearing things like

"I'm not even a fan of ___ but it's making the right people angry and I'm here for it"

Those people don't buy tickets. They don't buy T-shirts. They don't buy games, they don't buy comics, they don't buy collectables, they don't go to conventions. In fact, they mocked all of the above. And when the franchise crashes and burns... They laugh. Or they want to take it over and turn it into something unrecognizable. This is the basic play..

User Comment Image

Meanwhile you have an army of die hard, life long fans who will pay you to give them the thing they like. Not only will they pay you, they will bring others along to enjoy your product. Instead you cater to people who not only hate your product, but hate the people who like(d) your product. Now that's a garbage business model.

They know if they create their own shows, films, and games from scratch nobody would buy it. So they leech off popular IPs and essentially burn it to the ground.

User Comment Image
DocSpock
DocSpock - 6/11/2026, 10:29 PM
@XRayCat -

Truer words were never spoken.
FlixMentallo21
FlixMentallo21 - 6/11/2026, 11:41 PM
@XRayCat - oh, get spayed.
XRayCat
XRayCat - 6/12/2026, 12:26 AM
@FlixMentallo21 - Here's a new idea for you. I'll get you a spoon so you can eat my ass.
Radders
Radders - 6/12/2026, 2:47 AM
@XRayCat - And they don't even see that they're doing it, they're so slavish to their dogma that they still think it's everyone else's fault
FlixMentallo21
FlixMentallo21 - 6/12/2026, 9:15 AM
@XRayCat - And I’ll grab a hammer and break your hand holding the spoon.
XRayCat
XRayCat - 6/12/2026, 3:09 PM
@FlixMentallo21 - You're holding the spoon chief, I'm not feeding it to you.
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 6/11/2026, 9:20 PM
They can take all the time they need as long as they retcon the show back to the end of Capaldi.
ModHaterSLADE
ModHaterSLADE - 6/11/2026, 9:44 PM
I actually liked the latest actor they got for the Doctor, but the writing just became lazy trash. Crap like Space Babies is some of the dumbest shit I've ever seen from the franchise🤦🏾‍♂️
theFUZZ008
theFUZZ008 - 6/12/2026, 9:01 AM
@ModHaterSLADE - It wasn't 100% percent, but it was good up until the bi-generation. That was unearned. The new Doc didn't get the baton, and it was a "have your cake and eat it to." RTD couldn't help himself.
ModernAudience
ModernAudience - 6/11/2026, 9:46 PM
That's the whole issue with modern writers, they tackle all these issues with a "sledgehammer".
NinnesMBC
NinnesMBC - 6/11/2026, 10:18 PM
Doctor Who can't "abandon preachiness" when it has been doing it from the start. That's a narrow minded pipe dream that says that person has never watched Doctor Who.

Star Wars in itself is still far more toxic than DW.
DocSpock
DocSpock - 6/11/2026, 10:40 PM

The radical left creates nothing. They only destroy.

It is their perverse sadistic joy. And if you don't completely submit to their twisted perverted anarchistic views, they will do their best to destroy you and everything you care about.




FlixMentallo21
FlixMentallo21 - 6/11/2026, 11:42 PM
@DocSpock -
OmegaBlack13
OmegaBlack13 - 6/12/2026, 1:04 AM
@DocSpock - These are the words of a schizophrenic.
TheUnworthyThor
TheUnworthyThor - 6/12/2026, 2:46 AM
@DocSpock - What kind of nonsense is that? As if Spielberg, Lucas, Cameron, Kirby, Siegel, Shuster, Roddenberry, etc aren’t/weren’t on the left.
Radders
Radders - 6/12/2026, 2:53 AM
@TheUnworthyThor - I think the key word was "radical" there
TheUnworthyThor
TheUnworthyThor - 6/12/2026, 3:06 AM
@Radders - People on the left don’t describe themselves as radical so that’s a meaningless term used to describe nothing with substance. Might as well use the word boogeyman. If the term is being applied to people on the far left I would think a person whose wife described them as a communist as pretty far left. So would probably be someone who moved out of the country when Trump was elected. And New Deal democrats had some very far left political views.
DocSpock
DocSpock - 6/12/2026, 3:53 AM
@OmegaBlack13 -

You need to get a dictionary so you can insult me properly. That word doesn't fit what I wrote.

Radders
Radders - 6/12/2026, 8:53 AM
@TheUnworthyThor - To be honest, how the people on the left describe themselves is kind of irrelevant, when someone refers to the "radical left" its pretty clear what they mean, but I appreciate the cordial reply.
Batmangina
Batmangina - 6/12/2026, 10:04 AM
@TheUnworthyThor - Yes and I never knew it because they never greased a strap-on with it and tried to cornhole me.

The vast majority of those creators' legacy IPs are unrecognizable money losing dogshit now.

Name one legacy IP that has diversified and is outperforming the original. I'll wait.

User Comment Image

TheUnworthyThor
TheUnworthyThor - 6/12/2026, 3:44 PM
@Radders - It’s completely relevant. Otherwise the other side gets to completely create a group of people who might not associate with each other and have very different goals to each other and then group them together based upon whatever characteristics suit them in the moment and then demonize them for it. That’s what we call propaganda.

And no it is not clear. I am telling you right here and now I do not know to whom you are referring. Is it communists, anarchists, democratic socialists, progressives, social democrats? The left loves their labels so there many already there but they are describing different people with very different beliefs. If the term radical left supposed to be a catch all term for everyone on the far left well then it’s already a superfluous term and since it is so often slapped onto people who are moderate liberals then the term loses clear descriptive capabilities. The problem is the word radical as a long history of being used by a faction of Republicans to describe themselves and then in more modern times by people on the right to differentiate themselves from other people on the far right because of their particular political beliefs. It wasn’t being used as a catch all for all people on the far right because that term already existed.
TheUnworthyThor
TheUnworthyThor - 6/12/2026, 4:42 PM
@Batmangina - Is that like a trick question? Are you using a different definition of outperform? Like Marvel generates far more income now than (including accounting for inflation) than it did when Kirby was writing the comics. Superman generates far more income that when Siegel and Shuster were writing the character. Star Trek generates for more income now than it did in the 60’s. I really don’t understand what you are trying to say. Like is your point that the various franchises aren’t currently today at their zenith of cultural popularity? Because like uh no duh? What is? That’s just how things happen. One day westerns are the most popular genre in film and television and then one day they are not. It’s not because they “diversified”. Nothing lasts forever. Things have peaks and valleys. Life goes on. New generations with new tastes come in. Rinse and repeat. People trying to assign their own political axes they have to grind to explain the way the world has always behaved is just weird.
Batmangina
Batmangina - 6/12/2026, 6:46 PM
@TheUnworthyThor - Marvel Comics sales and market share is dogshit compared to its peak or even midlevel average.

The MCU is already in the shitter compared to just 10 years ago - the DCU is DOA.

Superman The Movie is THE Superman film of record AND box office adjusted for inflation and it's not even close.

The X-Men sold 100s of THOUSANDS of copies per month - how many Gay Iceman and Safespace comics get sold?

Jack shit. Uncanny X-Men revenue in the 80s would likely beat revenue of today's books at today's prices.

OLD Star Trek generates more revenue than ever. Not the DEI Space Lesbian bullshit.

Just like 30 year old episodes of FRIENDS outperforms 99% of today's dogshit 'content'

A [frick]ing movie ticket is $16 average today - it was $3 when I saw Raiders of the Lost Ark in the theater.

It actually IS because the got 'diversified' Star Trek was progressive as [frick] when I was a kid and it was still [frick]ing awesome.

DOCTOR WHO was the same way - now both of them are in your face DEI Diddy Parties and are either cancelled or in the shitter ratings wise.

User Comment Image
OmegaBlack13
OmegaBlack13 - 6/12/2026, 1:07 AM
“I don’t need this show to criticize me for my bigotry, I’d rather just not have to see anything that’s gay or trans, or preferably, non white. I just want pure escapism. As long as it’s straight and white.” is just such an a funny complaint to make, and incredible that the people who make it don’t realize what a self report it is.
Radders
Radders - 6/12/2026, 2:51 AM
@OmegaBlack13 - Who made that complaint, I've never seen it?
NGFB
NGFB - 6/12/2026, 1:08 AM
Goeth woketh, goeth broketh
PutinsGooch
PutinsGooch - 6/12/2026, 1:46 AM
Yet again, certain folk blaming it on the nebulous right wing catch-all of 'wokeness', as if Doctor Who was never 'woke' before (see similar arguments about Trek). The problem was that the quality of the writing and the ideas began to decline during Capaldi's era, and poor Jodie Whittaker only had a handful of decent episodes. The last two seasons with Ncuti were a massive improvement and had some truly standout episodes (though it doesn't help that one of the best was a doctorless episode) but RTD's increasing reliance on gimmicks and teases was frankly infuriating. The 'bring Billie back' choice was ludicrous. And yes I know that complaining about things being ludicrous in a show about a time travelling alien with two hearts is somewhat insane, but it just felt like a last gasp of life.
Radders
Radders - 6/12/2026, 2:50 AM
@PutinsGooch - The writing is negatively impacted by modern "wokeness". Capaldi's era suffered, in part, because of the pushing of Identity Politics
PutinsGooch
PutinsGooch - 6/12/2026, 4:37 AM
@Radders - the wokeness has always been there. In facts it's vital to shows like Doctor Who.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 6/12/2026, 6:47 AM
@PutinsGooch - The "Too Woke" debate in a nutshell:

A: It's bad because it's woke.
B: Do you mean because it had protagonists who weren't straight white males?
A: No, that's not the problem, it's forced inclusion.
B: Do you think they could have made a better show with a comparably diverse cast?
A: Of course, I'm not a monster.
B: Then the problem is the writing, not the diversity.
A: [Silence]
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder