Lanterns Backlash Intensifies As DC Studios Podcast Host Brands Hal Jordan A Racist

Lanterns Backlash Intensifies As DC Studios Podcast Host Brands Hal Jordan A Racist

Lanterns' controversial take on Hal Jordan and John Stewart has sparked heated debate, but an unexpected claim that Hal is "canonically" racist has added another surprising layer to the discussion.

By JoshWilding - Sep 02, 2026 05:09 AM EST
Filed Under: Lanterns

Sunday's episode of Lanterns divided opinions after establishing that John Stewart Sr. was offered the Green Lantern ring before Hal Jordan. However, his love for his family and the heavy socio-political reality he's faced as a Black man in America made him afraid.

The apparent insinuation that Hal "stole" the ring from a Black man has generated a lot of heated debates. Some have praised Lanterns' hard-hitting approach to racial issues, but others feel that framing Hal's selection in a way that can be interpreted as an advantage afforded by his white privilege is a misstep. 

The suggestion that Hal could more easily appear "fearless" due to not experiencing the same societal fears is valid (his actual origin and the sources of his fearlessness will be explored in a future episode). Still, traditional Green Lantern lore centres on willpower and the ability to overcome fear as universal, individual qualities.

With that in mind, many fans have argued that the episode has rewritten why Hal is Green Lantern. At the same time, John's origin has been criticised as placing too much emphasis on his family's experiences with racism and his mother's influence, rather than his own individual agency and worthiness.

It's a complicated, hot-button issue. John's political awareness and the exploration of race also have roots in his 1970s comic origins, and Bernadette Stewart's perspective is presented as her interpretation shaped by experience, not necessarily the objective cosmic truth. 

Still, as fans continue to argue about this creative direction for Lanterns, fuel has been added to the fire from an unexpected source. 

It started when DC Studios Showcase: The Official Podcast host Frankey Smith took to Threads to write, "Hate to break it to ya but Hal is indeed a bit of a racist." When a fan took issue with that, Smith suggested he watch Paw Patrol instead of Lanterns and doubled down on Hal "canonically" being a racist, using this excerpt as an example:

a82c856592e318ee4619bbec3a83863511 lantern 3.w710

In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the socially conscious Green Lantern/Green Arrow run by Dennis O’Neil and Neal Adams deliberately portrayed Hal as an establishment-oriented figure who was somewhat out of touch with Earth-bound social issues.

The Guardians of the Universe admonished Hal for saying John has a "chip on his shoulder," calling out his "petty bigotries." He also referred to his Inuit friend/sidekick Tom Kalmaku with the outdated and offensive nickname "Pieface," which has long been dropped and treated as a product of its era.

Now, Hal and John are routinely shown as equals and allies, and it would be misleading to describe Hal as "canonically" racist based solely on those early stories (any more than John is for labelling Hal "whitey" during the same era of now-outdated storytelling). 

You can read the exchange in the X posts below.

About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
A lifelong comic book fan who grew up on Spider-Man: The Animated Series in the '90s, Josh Wilding has been contributing to ComicBookMovie.com since 2009.

While he's also written for websites like Batman-News, HeyUGuys, and WhatCulture, Josh is CBM's Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and the site's #1 contributor with nearly two decades of experience covering film and TV news (including interviews with Tom Holland, Chris Pratt, Gary Oldman, Halle Berry, Jon Bernthal, Tom Welling, and hundreds more).

Based in the UK with his wife, Josh is also an avid WWE and Formula 1 fan and writes about those passions on CBM's sister sites, TheRingReport.com and FullThrottleHQ.com. Favourite superhero? Spider-Man. Favourite pro wrestler? CM Punk. Favourite F1 driver? Max Verstappen.
Lanterns: The Name Of Laura Linney's Character Sparks Intriguing Twist Theory - Spoilers
Related:

Lanterns: The Name Of Laura Linney's Character Sparks Intriguing Twist Theory - Spoilers

Lanterns: Sinestro Tells Hal Jordan To Kill John Stewart In New Episode 4 Teaser
Recommended For You:

Lanterns: Sinestro Tells Hal Jordan To Kill John Stewart In New Episode 4 Teaser

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, Comic Book Movie is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. Comic Book Movie will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that Comic Book Movie, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 9/2/2026, 5:38 AM
"The suggestion that Hal could more easily appear "fearless" due to not experiencing the same societal fears is valid." Wait wtf??? So now people who haven't experienced racism are exempt of any other forms of fear in their lives? Dude literally lost his dad in a plane crash when he was just a child.
Beer85
Beer85 - 9/2/2026, 5:43 AM
Thing is, this person who hosts that Podcast most likely does not read comics. The panel does not prove anything since GL saves the entire universe on a regular basis in the comics, all races and types of people included. It just says quite a lot what type of person you are when you answer in that way to a fan, instead of saying "I get what you are saying but keep watching!" or something along those lines.

The good thing that fans can take from this is that they finally know that most of these people working on these shows and movies are not fans, and they are not interested in doing the comics versions of the characters.
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 9/2/2026, 5:48 AM
@Beer85 - The thing that is even more ming boggling to me at least, is that what do they think it's gonna happen after this? The bare minimum a bunch of people will stop watching the podcast (not sure if it's even watched by that many in the first place). Worst case scenario it will piss off some people that were already on the fence with this how even further making them drop it.

From all the stupid things she said, saying "DC may not be for you" is like a fireable offence if Gunn has any backbone. A brand podcast has one main mission: promote the brand.
Mercwitham0uth
Mercwitham0uth - 9/2/2026, 5:49 AM
Podcast host sounds mentally ill.
Why
Why - 9/2/2026, 5:49 AM
I'm not sure that Hal is racist. I don't think he is at all, actually. I think, even in the comics referenced, it's more an oversight/ignorance rather than coming from a place of contempt (the writers who came up with "Pieface" were probably the same- didn't see the harm- obviously that's been re-evaluated since).

In the case of the show, it's- as Josh wrote- his mother's interpretation of what has happened in the selection process for the Lanterns. It's a bit more nuanced than "you are one thing", as if often is in reality (although there is still quite a lot of racism to go around there too). Nuance doesn't get clicks though, does it.
UnderBelly
UnderBelly - 9/2/2026, 6:01 AM
@Why - Yeah i don't think he's racist, I think he was written by people who were maybe a bit ignorant/unaware but this is totally a different thing.

harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 9/2/2026, 5:52 AM
don't worry lads,

they are gonna do Hal justice




User Comment Image

CyberNigerian
CyberNigerian - 9/2/2026, 5:53 AM
She shouldn't have phrased it like that, in my opinion.

However, Neal Adams wrote Hal Jordan with a noticeable blind side when it came to racial issues.

Geoff Johns’ Post‑Rebirth run was great fun, but it was interesting to see Hal’s darker history wiped away by shifting the blame onto Parallax. The rest of the Corps has felt sidelined ever since. There’s a real‑world parallel in how influential men often have their misdeeds erased to preserve their legacy.
tmp3
tmp3 - 9/2/2026, 5:56 AM
Nothing in the show at all indicates Hal is racist. At most it’s very clearly about the old guard refusing to step down for the new guard. John Stewart cries when he sees Hal’s dead body in 2026, so their relationship turmoil is obviously going to get resolved in the show. The need for this site to report every thing about this show in the most negative light possible is so strange, especially given the way it’s gassed up absolute slop like secret invasion in the past.
Sominan
Sominan - 9/2/2026, 6:04 AM
Black guy fails job aptitude test then he and his family blame racism while Guardians are completely oblivious to race on earth and promise his son will be GL one day as a participation trophy.

Not sure if woke or based...

The show goes to great lengths to show you that black people have to work 10 times harder than whites to get the same things whites have and that they are also intrinsically better than whites, suggesting they are given nothing by virtue of their race, while using the character of John Stewart to make this point, when John is literally the only GL created and included in anything because of his race. So much so that even the showrunners admit he has little backstory so they are making one up for him while borrowing from Kyle Rayner and Hal Jordan's stories to do so.
UnderBelly
UnderBelly - 9/2/2026, 6:07 AM
Hal wasn’t written as a racist—he was written as an establishment figure with massive blind spots.

​The writers used him as a foil for characters like Green Arrow and John Stewart specifically to highlight institutional privilege and naivety. Being ignorant of or out of touch with the Black struggle in the '80s/'90s makes him socio-politically clueless, not bigoted.

​Calling him "racist" just flattens decades of comic history for rage-bait instead of engaging with what the writers were actually doing with his character.

The podcaster needs to either apologise, step down or acknowledge she's fanning a flame she shouldn't have.
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 9/2/2026, 6:10 AM


User Comment Image
Matchesz
Matchesz - 9/2/2026, 6:21 AM
Between this and Andrew Garfield saying Spidermans ready for a gay peter parker are we not tired of the woke agenda yet ?
evilbastard
evilbastard - 9/2/2026, 6:23 AM
I remember reading that comic back then

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder