UPDATE 2: Man Of Tomorrow Star Adria Arjona Won't Clarify Which Character She's Playing In James Gunn's Sequel

UPDATE 2: Man Of Tomorrow Star Adria Arjona Won't Clarify Which Character She's Playing In James Gunn's Sequel

We've been led to believe that Adria Arjona is playing the villainous Maxima in Man of Tomorrow, but the Onslaught star wouldn't clarify her role during a new interview...

By MarkCassidy - Sep 02, 2026 09:09 PM EST
Filed Under: Man of Tomorrow

UPDATE 2: Though the outlet stops short of confirming anything outright, Forbes has referred to Arjona's (potential) Wonder Woman casting as the "worst-kept secret in the industry."

The site also believes that the cat will be officially let out of the bag before Man of Tomorrow's release, adding: "The potential Wonder Woman will only be in a few scenes of Man of Tomorrow, an introduction, not a true partnership."

Some of this report could be speculative, but Forbes has published similar pieces in the past shortly before official announcements or trade confirmation.

UPDATE: "How do I answer this without f*cking myself?"

We now have a clip from a new video interview with Arjona, in which she's asked what scared her most about joining the DCU in Man of Tomorrow.

Clearly, the Onslaught star has been told not to discuss her character (the trades are still claiming it's Maxima), and steers her answer towards feeling comfortable about reteaming with James Gunn and Peter Safran after working with them on The Belko Experiment.

Original story follows.

If Adria Arjona is playing Maxima in Man of Tomorrow, she should have no problem clarifying her role... right?

The Andor star is believed to be playing the powerful villain in James Gunn's Superman sequel, but speculation continues to mount that she has actually been cast as the DCU's Wonder Woman.

While speaking to Screen Rant, Arjona "wasn’t able to clarify her Man of Tomorrow character." This has only added more fuel to the fire, and fans are more convinced than ever that she's actually playing Diana.

Whoever Arjona is playing in the movie, she has gotten into tremendous shape for the role.

“I have muscles that I've never had in my life. I'm training two to three hours a day on a crazy diet. Drinking coffee is the only thing that keeps me up. And I’m really excited!”

Arjona did share her excitement about reuniting with DC Studios co-CEOs James Gunn and Peter Safran, who cast her in 2016's The Belko Experiment.

“I'm excited to be reunited with the family that started everything for me, which is Peter Safran and James Gunn. They gave me my first movie. I wouldn't have done any of the movies that we've spoken about today if not for them. I wouldn't be in Andor if it hadn't been for Peter Safran and James Gunn, so it feels really f--king cool and really exciting to reunite with that team and to be in that family. And that's all I'm going to tell you!”

Do you think Arjona is really playing Wonder Woman? Let us know in the comments.

The plot of MOT will focus on the Man of Steel (Corenswet) and Lex Luthor (Nicholas Hoult) putting their differences aside and joining forces to defend the planet against Brainiac (Lars Eidinger).

Rachel Brosnahan (Lois Lane), Skyler Gisondo (Jimmy Olsen), Sara Sampaio (Eve Teschmacher), Isabela Merced (Hawkgirl), and Maria Gabriella de Faria (The Engineer) have all been confirmed to return, and we recently learned that Aaron Pierre will reprise his Lanterns role as John Stewart.

Xolo Maridueña has also been confirmed to reprise the role of Blue Beetle.

"At its core, it’s about Clark and Lex," Gunn said in a recent interview. "I relate to both of them. I relate to Lex’s ambition and obsession — minus the murder. And I relate to Superman’s belief in people, his Midwestern values. They’re two sides of me."

Man of Tomorrow will hit theaters on July 9, 2027.

About The Author:
MarkCassidy
Member Since 11/9/2008
Mark Cassidy is a writer, photographer, amateur filmmaker, and Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic from Dublin, Ireland.
Adria Arjona Training Video Leads To Renewed Wonder Woman Speculation: She Ain't Doin' All That For Maxima!
Related:

Adria Arjona Training Video Leads To Renewed Wonder Woman Speculation: "She Ain't Doin' All That For Maxima!"

Blue Beetle Star Xolo Maridueña Breaks Silence On DCU Debut In Man Of Tomorrow
Recommended For You:

Blue Beetle Star Xolo Maridueña Breaks Silence On DCU Debut In Man Of Tomorrow

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, Comic Book Movie is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. Comic Book Movie will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that Comic Book Movie, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
thedrudo
thedrudo - 8/27/2026, 4:43 PM
Can’t wait for Onslaught next week!
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 8/27/2026, 4:47 PM
@thedrudo - User Comment Image
BiffDitko
BiffDitko - 8/29/2026, 7:46 AM
@thedrudo - Same! It's also a type of sequel to one of my FAVORITE Wingard movies:
"THE GUEST"!
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 8/27/2026, 4:47 PM
First off, we don't need Wonder Woman yet. Plus, having a major player getting scean time with Supes just won't work. All the other characters are b-level so it can't threaten Superman being front and center.

Secondly, if Gunn is so fond of lesser known characters that haven't been on screen yet, shes probably going to be Maxima.
InfinitePunches
InfinitePunches - 8/27/2026, 5:06 PM
@lazlodaytona - Brainiac is a worldwide threat. If Gunn wants to give this movie a sense of scale, he'll cut to different places all over the world of heroes fighting Brainiac drones. Bruce and Diana don't even have to meet Clark. Just show that the invasion is hitting Gotham and DC at the same time as Metropolis.

User Comment Image

Hell, throw Aquaman, Black Adam, and Geo-Force in there too.
mastakilla39
mastakilla39 - 8/27/2026, 6:53 PM
@lazlodaytona - DC needs it because they have no other big IP. Similar to Spiderman Homecoming or Civil War she will probably only be in it for 15 or 20 mins. They can't use Batman or Joker yet and the DCU can't rely on waiting for Superman every 2 years.

Flash and Aquaman are dead ips, Green Lantern is a small screen star, and nobody cares about B-level characters like the rumored Blue Beetle/Booster Gold, Death Stroke/Bane, or Sgt Rock movies. If they don't have another Big IP, then we don't have a a DCU we only a series of Superman films.
jst5
jst5 - 8/27/2026, 7:41 PM
@lazlodaytona - This site must be looking over the very loud rumor months ago that the reason this casting is a mystery is because the character was changed.Was going to be WW ...Paramount made Gunn change the character so script changes had to be made.
jst5
jst5 - 8/27/2026, 7:44 PM
@InfinitePunches - How could he do that???No newly casted actor can be signed to a contract post 2027 anymore unless Paramount approves and they are not doing that.You can say give them 1 year movie deals...sure don't expect any type of talent to play the part but still the issue is you have to get Paramount to approve said role which isn't going to happened.
InfinitePunches
InfinitePunches - 8/28/2026, 10:05 AM
@jst5 - You could find a way around that by having "Potential Batman" make his return.

Arrow, Gotham Knights, Birds of Prey 2002, Titans, and Creature Commandos all utilized "Potential Batman" when they wanted to make his presence known without committing to a costume design or actor.

User Comment Image
User Comment Image
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 8/29/2026, 12:04 PM
@jst5 - Paramount can't actually make those kinds of demands yet... Unless it were a condition of their deal to buy WB. Which I can't imagine a single reason why it would be. Wonder Woman could be a profitable property for them, but only a small part of the puzzle and certainly not the reason Paramount's looking to buy the studio.
jst5
jst5 - 8/29/2026, 6:54 PM
@Patient2670 - Paramount has to sign off on any contract that is longer than two years...they gain numerous things as soon as WB board and stockholders approved the deal.There is a reason DC has no live action projects post 2027.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 8/30/2026, 12:10 PM
@jst5 - Actor contracts aren't dictated by time periods anymore (though they once were, during "the Golden Age of Hollywood"), they're dictated by how many movies are negotiated under those specific contracts. This way, an actor can go do a movie for another studio, provided that it doesn't interfere with the scheduling of a film already under contract. Essentially a sequel clause is meant to avoid exactly the type of thing that happened with Henry Cavill on Justice League / Mission Impossible. So, in fact, her contract for MOT may be a guarantee of one movie with the option for more at an asking price negotiated between the studio and her agents or lawyers under the current agreement.

And, you're partially correct about DC projects post 2027. Aside from The Batmann Part II, nothing is currently in production. But Warners, as a whole, has plenty. DC alone, has several in active developement, but are likely waiting to greenlight to avoid the same situation as when David Zaslav and Discovery bought the studio and trashed movies without releasing them. The reason they continue developmemnt is to show potential buyers an active (and hopefully financially viable) slate of projects which makes the studio look more valuable, and ready to go after a sale. However, if thse movies are actively spending money on production or prep, that number becomes debit, which could potentially make the purchase of said studio, less attractive. It's a negotiating tactic, like staging your home, before showing it to realtors or having an open house. Done on the seller's end, not the buyer's
jst5
jst5 - 8/31/2026, 2:25 AM
@Patient2670 - Actors 100% have movie deals/years committed to in their contract...that's what I'm meaning by Paramount has to sign off ON anything that's longer than two years.WB is pretty much Paramount's now...the only thing holding it up is some dumb states who are doing it because of politics...it's nothing but kicking the can down the road for a show.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 8/31/2026, 11:44 AM
@jst5 - I won't get into the politics of the merger. There are a lot of legitimate reasons for concern. As long as those concerns get addressed, then fine, go ahead, but not before. I'm sure both studios are proceeding as best they can, under the presumption that the deal will still go forward.

Paramount may have the option to weigh in on signing actors to multi picture deals, but again, studios don't have exclusive multi year contracts with actors. They may have first-look or developement deals if an actor is shopping a project (which simply means that the studio gets the first choice as to whether or not they pick up the project before it gets taken elsewhere). But what you're describing is a contract which would make an actor exclusive to a studio. Even if a studio wanted to do something like that, any actors they would offer it to would definitely not take it. Again, that would have prevented someone like Henry Cavill from doing Mission Impossible, or Tom Holland from doing the Odyssey. A studio may offer a contract that says, we want to hire you for X ammount of movies (whether that comes in the form of new projects or sequels).

Writers, producers, or directors do often have what are known as overalls - where they sign exclusively with the studio for a period (usually 3 years) and are required to develop or pitch a certain number of potential projects within that period, whether or not they end up getting produced. In return, they e studio gives them a salary for the length of that contract, and often office space on the lot. But the studio then owns those pitches and even if they don't want to make them, they have the right to keep any other studio from picking them up. Where it gets complicated, is when you have someone like a Margot Robbie, who produces projects under her Lucky Chap, company. As a producer, her deal probably gives the studio first look or right of refusal over those, but as an actor, she can still do the next Pirates of the Carribbean for Disney, as an actor for hire.
MisterBones
MisterBones - 8/27/2026, 4:52 PM
She is Maxima. Its obvious. No need for Diana in this kind of story.

Gunn is also gonna get all he can get out of Lois being jealous of this super powered woman pushing up on Clark.
ClarkJoeKent
ClarkJoeKent - 8/27/2026, 5:03 PM
@MisterBones - Nothing was interesting between her & Superman in the last weak film. All he did was cry to her then ran to her in the end to kiss & float(rushed scenes) Cant even watch Gunns wacky goofy Superman2025 twice! It like Thor Love & Thunder
Nolanite
Nolanite - 8/27/2026, 7:34 PM
@MisterBones -

Why does the movie need Maxima then?
Especially if she's a villain?

Nolanite out
ClarkJoeKent
ClarkJoeKent - 8/27/2026, 4:59 PM
James Gunn isn't NOT allowed to USE BATMAN or Wonder Woman without consent from Paramount who DID NOT ReNew his contract which is up Feb 2027!! Thank God. Get rid of this wacky, goofy DCU(Dead Cinematic Universe)
mastakilla39
mastakilla39 - 8/27/2026, 7:04 PM
@ClarkJoeKent - That Paramount deal is not going through, they are still being sued. Negotiations are going to take a whole another year in which WB is likely just going to walk away with the free 7 billion dollars Paramount owes them due to the delay.

WB has no idea on how to sell any other character besides Batman and Joker. Even if he doesn't get a full contract renewal for another 4 years he is definitely getting an extension of at least 2 years. Paramount has stated they want Gunn so whether WB gets acquired or not, I don't see Gunn leaving for at least 8 to 10 years unless Batman 2 and Superman 2 flop as bad as Supergirl.
ClarkJoeKent
ClarkJoeKent - 8/28/2026, 8:17 AM
@mastakilla39 - In order to have a JOB as a studio CEO/Director you NEED a VALID CONTRACT thru said years. Gunn/Safran contracts have NOT been extended & OR have NOT been RENEWED. In Hollywood terms it means YOUR FIRED on the last day of that contract! Ask everyone at WB/DC animated films that contracts ran out LAST WEEK!!😂😂😂
Talk about COPE0-A-MANIA!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
InfinitePunches
InfinitePunches - 8/27/2026, 5:07 PM
Get her some Brandon Routh-ian blue contacts, stat!

User Comment Image
SADFFLECK
SADFFLECK - 8/27/2026, 5:23 PM
@InfinitePunches - them things look uncanny for some reason
ModernAudience
ModernAudience - 8/27/2026, 5:52 PM
@SADFFLECK - because the pupils never change. Dill eyes
KetracelWhite74
KetracelWhite74 - 8/27/2026, 5:12 PM
She's either playing Clayface's sister or Gorilla Grodd's banana peeler.
Gambito
Gambito - 8/27/2026, 5:13 PM
She is Diana otherwise there’s absolutely no point in being so coy and James Gunn knows it
SADFFLECK
SADFFLECK - 8/27/2026, 5:26 PM
@Gambito - this Universe is so [frick]ED!
damn
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 8/27/2026, 5:29 PM
Honestly I would be more suspicious about her neither confirming nor denying who she is playing if we didn’t have other actors new to the cast whose characters we don’t know either such as Matthew Lillard , Andre Royo & Sinqua Walls so I think that’s moreso in general then for her specifically.

I wouldn’t mind if she’s just playing Maxima but if she is DCU Diana (which I doubt) then I think she could make a good Wonder Woman going by some of her past work tbh!!.

User Comment Image
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 8/27/2026, 5:36 PM
Someone's smelling burnt toast over this...
Forthas
Forthas - 8/27/2026, 7:48 PM
Adria Arjona is an up an coming star...she should look at what happened to Millie Alcock and get out of this project altogether.
JFerguson
JFerguson - 8/27/2026, 8:04 PM
This [frick]ing dude James Gunn casts pretty latinas in everything he does. What tf is this guys obsession with pretty latinas. Buddy boy must be steaming at the fact he couldn't cast Inde Navarette as Zatanna. Although knowing his track record with obscure characters, he'd cast her as Madame Xanadu or something.

vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 8/28/2026, 3:25 AM
@JFerguson - dude, his wife is white 😂
ClarkJoeKent
ClarkJoeKent - 8/28/2026, 8:18 AM
@vectorsigma - Your here GLAZING again!😂😂
JFerguson
JFerguson - 8/28/2026, 1:59 PM
@vectorsigma - buddy Gunn cucked himself by letting the chad John Cena smooch up his wife. Wouldn’t surprise me if he has a cuck Latina fetish
TDKRnry88
TDKRnry88 - 8/29/2026, 7:39 AM
@JFerguson - Are you... complaining that he frequently casts pretty Latinas?!?!?
JFerguson
JFerguson - 8/29/2026, 5:47 PM
@TDKRnry88 - maybe jealousy really
VampMime187cbm
VampMime187cbm - 8/27/2026, 8:50 PM
Who cares. She only gonna her two times before that bitch Gunn gets fired. Won’t even get her own movie.
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 8/29/2026, 7:25 AM
@VampMime187cbm - sorry, who's firing Gunn? Ellison is still backing him.

See you in 2036.
TDKRnry88
TDKRnry88 - 8/29/2026, 7:52 AM
@VampMime187cbm - "that bitch Gunn"

Ooh! We've got a tough guy over here! You're on a comic book movie forum. Calm down.
BestAtWhatIDo
BestAtWhatIDo - 8/29/2026, 9:50 AM
@TDKRnry88 - lol why do people hate Gunn so much? He's perhaps the second or third most influential guy in comic book movies, he's partly responsible for their resurgence. Is it because he's liberal? I've got bad news about most of the creators of your favorite comics.
VampMime187cbm
VampMime187cbm - 8/31/2026, 5:43 PM
@TDKRnry88 - You hit the turnpike doin 95, Thinkin you Superman and was gonna make it out alive. Now it’s a rap forum.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder