Netflix's Ted Sarandos Blasts James Cameron Over Paramount "Disinformation" On Warner Bros. Deal

Netflix's Ted Sarandos Blasts James Cameron Over Paramount "Disinformation" On Warner Bros. Deal

Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos has hit back at Avatar: Fire and Ash director James Cameron after the filmmaker recently gave Paramount Skydance his full backing in the war for Warner Bros.

By JoshWilding - Feb 21, 2026 01:02 PM EST
Filed Under: Netflix
Source: THR (via SFFGazette.com)

Terminator and Avatar creator James Cameron's word carries a lot of weight in Hollywood, and the filmmaker recently weighed in on Netflix's proposed merger with Warner Bros. Pictures.

In a letter to Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah), the filmmaker backed Paramount Skydance, reminding him of Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos's past comments that movie theaters are an "outdated concept." Expressing several concerns, Cameron questioned the streamer's promises and called its current theatrical releases a "token" gesture meant to help them qualify for Academy Awards.

He added, "I am but a humble movie farmer. And I see my future creativity and productivity directly threatened by this proposed sale."

With Paramount back in the mix to purchase Warner Bros. Discovery—whoever ultimately wins the day will have an unprecedented level of power in the film and TV industry—Netflix has hit back at the Aliens helmer.

Appearing on Fox Business Network's The Claman Countdown (via SFFGazette.com), Sarandos said, "I’m particularly surprised and disappointed that James chose to be part of the Paramount disinformation campaign that’s been going on for months about this deal."

"I have never even uttered the words '17-day window.' So I don’t know where it came from or why he would be part of that machine," the executive said of Cameron's claim that Netflix will not commit to a 45-day theatrical window. "Movies go into the theaters for 45 days, a healthy, robust slate of films every year, that is going to continue. This deal is contingent on that for us to — for it to work."

Sarandos has sent a letter of his own to Lee, stating that Cameron "knowingly misrepresents our position and commitment to the theatrical release of Warner Bros. films."

Earlier this week, we learned that Warner Bros. Discovery is mulling over Paramount Skydance's latest acquisition offer, despite setting a date—March 20—for shareholders to vote on its planned deal with Netflix. 

By re-engaging with David Ellison and Paramount, the hope is to secure a "best and final" offer from the company...which, ultimately, may force Netflix to pay significantly more for WBD. Either way, it's a win/win situation for David Zaslav and his fellow executives. 

While Netflix is currently looking to acquire Warner Bros.' film and television assets for $27.75 per share, Paramount is willing to go upwards of $31 per share. It's unclear whether Paramount will accept WBD's offer to re-engage; the alternative is pursuing a proxy fight to get board members to vote down the Netflix deal next month.

Paramount is clearly determined to derail the previously agreed $82.7 billion Netflix deal. Netflix's offer is only for Warner Bros. Pictures and HBO/HBO Max. The Ellisons, meanwhile, want the entire company, including cable channels like CNN, TNT, Discovery, HGTV, and Food Network.

As always, keep checking back here for updates as we have them. 

About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
Comic Book Reader. Film Lover. WWE and F1 Fan. Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and ComicBookMovie.com's #1 contributor.
Netflix Drops First Trailer For The Boroughs, A Supernatural Mystery With Strong Stranger Things Vibes
Related:

Netflix Drops First Trailer For The Boroughs, A Supernatural Mystery With Strong Stranger Things Vibes

ONE PIECE: THE BATTLE OF ALABASTA Sets 2027 Premiere; First Teaser And Logo Revealed
Recommended For You:

ONE PIECE: THE BATTLE OF ALABASTA Sets 2027 Premiere; First Teaser And Logo Revealed

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, Comic Book Movie is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. Comic Book Movie will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that Comic Book Movie, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Nonameforme
Nonameforme - 2/21/2026, 1:22 PM
Netflix and Paramount are both terrible choices
epc1122
epc1122 - 2/21/2026, 1:43 PM
@Nonameforme - i personally would have preferred comcast but Netflix is much more popular than paramount and Comcast’s and I just want a healthy slate of dc movies than can be experienced by the most amount of people. Dc movies that are on Netflix actually do well with the streaming numbers so I think that would bode well with more dc content to come.
Irregular
Irregular - 2/21/2026, 2:47 PM
@epc1122 - WBD is more than just "DC" though. Both are terrible choices for the entertainment industry as a whole. You forget that this means they would own "DC Comics" as well. This puts future comic books in jeopardy because of this. They could literally have a hand in ending anything physical media related, INCLUDING comic books, DVD's, blu-rays, all without even a second thought. Sure there is arguments about how it's been doing in sales...but that IS where this IP thrives from and THEY could have a reason to destroy it based on sales revenue.

Not to mention their video game division, which Netflix already doesn't see any value in it as it is. They'll likely compare it to other metrics in the future, simply because it is being constantly mismanaged, year after year after year.

-SSKTJL and it's horrible live-service and confusing marketing strategy
-Lame Gotham Knights game that tries to catch interest but fails with it's clunky gameplay
-Lack of any post launch plans for Hogwarts Legacy due to constant management and company mergers
-Ridiculous Multiversus BETA that opened to all...closed down for re-release in a year because they NOW DECIDE it needs a new graphics overhaul....
=Disappointing Mortal Kombat game that has likely set the franchise back to another and maybe "definitive" hiatus, where likely will live on through other forms of media and be licensed out to other video game developers without Ed Boon.
=My absolute FAVORITE...announcing games for shareholders and then cancelling them...for shareholders. Like Wonder Woman!

Just another entropic nightmare in corporate America.
epc1122
epc1122 - 2/21/2026, 3:10 PM
@Irregular - I can see your points but a lot of what you mentioned doesn’t apply to me because i don’t buy physical media anymore, don’t really buy comics, nor video games and my main concern is wanting more movies and tv shows . I’d prefer movies because honestly, I think as I get older my attention span is worse and tv shows are too time consuming lol I think 8-10 non dc movies,3-5 dc movies and maybe some tv shows for the year would be optimal for me. But it is what it is.
Irregular
Irregular - 2/21/2026, 3:59 PM
@epc1122 - That's exactly what it is now.... do you truly believe everyone watches every single movie that releases in one year? I mean people do watch 8-10 non DC movies, 3-5 DC movies.

I can see your point as well since your concern is wanting more movies and TV shows yet your attention span is worse and TV shows are too time consuming...yeah...what amazing logic 🙄. "Netflix, prepare more movies and TV shows even though I'll be so old that I might watch more movies and think you produced too many TV shows that are time consuming...please value my opinion!" is literally the equivalent to what you said in your comment.

i don’t buy physical media anymore, don’t really buy comics, nor video games and my main concern is wanting more movies and tv shows . I’d prefer movies because honestly, I think as I get older my attention span is worse and tv shows are too time consuming"

This is why focused groups should not dictate movies or television shows. In case some asshat runs into YOU.
epc1122
epc1122 - 2/21/2026, 4:25 PM
@Irregular - I’m not quite sure why you’re getting so nasty and can’t have a conversation. I don’t think everyone shares my opinion but I was letting you know my preferred output from the studio. I’d prefer movies over tv shows but I can see them still doing tv shows. I never said I don’t want anything but I’d rather they concentrate on quality over quantity. It’s not that confusing or illogical. I think focus groups are important but not the only things to consider for the studios. Physical media is a dying and video games aren’t what they used to be either. When was the last time there was a dc game? The only popular dc games were the injustice series and Arkham games, It isn’t like there are a lot on the horizon either and that’s for both marvel and dc. Comic sales in general
Have also plummeted. Again, I’d rather they concentrate on quality over quantity. Whoever buys wb, whether it’s paramount or Netflix could be discontinuing comics and the video games division so I’m not even sure why you would bring that up. If a division of wb isn’t making money, would think anything is on the table for being discontinued. But it is what it is, hope you’re having a nice day 👍😊
dragon316
dragon316 - 2/21/2026, 7:14 PM
@Nonameforme - better than Disney
DocSpock
DocSpock - 2/21/2026, 1:31 PM

Netflix winning is bad for the industry and consumers.

But Netflix is all in, and they will win. Money usually does.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 2/21/2026, 2:00 PM
In an ideal world WB would know how to run their own company and wouldn't need to be thrown around from one company to another every few years.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 2/21/2026, 2:32 PM
@TheJok3r - Merging with Discovery was a HUGE misstep. Someone overvalued Discovery and now that no one wants the stock anymore, they have no choice but to sell to cover their massive debt. So dumb.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 2/21/2026, 2:23 PM
Movies typically stay in theaters for 30-60 days or used to pre pandemic which has since moved to 30-45 so Netflix honoring the full 45 day one that we have now seems fine to me.

However not sure why Sarandos would be surprised about Cameron taking Paramount’s side considering they are the traditional studio fighting against a streamer which Netflix is still considered so makes sense one of the most prolific filmmakers of all time will be on the side of the former!!.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 2/21/2026, 2:27 PM
James Cameron is and always has been a prick. Everyone in Hollywood knows it and it's amazing he still gets to make movies. People canceled Whedon for being a tyrant on the set, but no one talks about the fact that Cameron carries around a nail gun on set. If he hears a cell phone, he demands it and nails it to the wall.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 2/21/2026, 2:30 PM
@JackDeth - to be fair , I think Whedon was moreso cancelled for the harassment allegations then being a dick on set.

However I do get what you mean.
xfactor
xfactor - 2/21/2026, 2:32 PM
@JackDeth - cameron is a hard ass,but going by reports whedon was much worse. Its one thing to he strict, its another to be abusive
JackDeth
JackDeth - 2/21/2026, 2:34 PM
@xfactor - Ask Katherine Bigelow if Cameron was abusive.
xfactor
xfactor - 2/21/2026, 2:38 PM
@JackDeth - I looked it up and its not pulling up anything about James being abusive. Its reporting that they still have a professional relationship and that their divorce was amicable.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 2/21/2026, 2:40 PM
@TheVisionary25 - Let's be clear, Whedon was canceled because he 'ruined Snyder's vision' and no other reason. The abusive on-set tyrant argument was settled fifteen years previous with Charisma Carpenter admitting she was overreacting. When the cultists got mad at him for being too strict with Snyder's non-actors, they dug into his past to find those allegations and once they drew blood, it was over.
XenoJazz
XenoJazz - 2/21/2026, 2:42 PM
@xfactor - Yeah he doesn't know what he's talking about. Cameron can be a dick and hard on his people for sure but you cant argue the results. The guy knows how to make movies and always goes the extra mile.
xfactor
xfactor - 2/21/2026, 2:50 PM
@XenoJazz - cameron is a serious film maker. He doesnt allow any distractions on set from what I have gathered. Whedon on the other hand was berating cast members on set. 2 totally different things
JackDeth
JackDeth - 2/21/2026, 2:54 PM
@xfactor - Yeah, nothing official. It's one of those 'worst-kept-secrets-in-Hollywood' type of things, like how mean Ellen was or how horrible Harvey Weinstein was.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 2/21/2026, 3:46 PM
@XenoJazz - Who he? Me he? Cameron is a dick. Whedon is a dick. My point is that one got canceled and one didn't. Also, getting 'results' doesn't justify abusive behavior. Ed Harris punched Cameron on the set of 'ABYSS' because of his behavior and said he would never work with him again.
XenoJazz
XenoJazz - 2/21/2026, 4:05 PM
@JackDeth - So because someone is a hard a** and expects results means he shouldn't get to make movies anymore?? The crew treated Cameron like garbage on the set of Aliens and he pushed back which led to the greatest action sequel of all time. Whedon got booted due to all the weird stuff that came out about Buffy and weird boob humor shots in Justice League. The Snyder fans have always been a lot but the two directors don't really compare. Whedon came across as creepy whereas all of the Cameron stuff was that he was just mean. And Cameron has fully acknowledged that he went too far on The Abyss but it also gave us one of Ed Harris' best performances.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 2/21/2026, 6:51 PM
@XenoJazz - "So because someone is a hard a** and expects results means he shouldn't get to make movies anymore?? "

The double-standard is ridiculous. 'Boob humor' was not why Whedon was canceled. He was trying to get a good movie out of the trash Snyder was making and he failed because the cast sucked.

Tell you what I'll stop defending Whedon if you stop pretending Cameron isn't a piece of shit.
XenoJazz
XenoJazz - 2/21/2026, 7:37 PM
@JackDeth - Dude Bigelow an Cameron are still friends. Cameron even pushed for Bigelow to direct the Hurt Locker. He's a bad husband yes and definitely an asshole. But Whedon is a full on creep. And yes he failed at making a good Justice League film. But thats not why hes out of Hollywood now.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 2/21/2026, 7:49 PM
@XenoJazz - So you're not going to drop this apparently. Whatever. Bored now
XenoJazz
XenoJazz - 2/21/2026, 7:57 PM
@JackDeth - *Give up. Fixed it for ya.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 2/21/2026, 10:38 PM
@XenoJazz - Whatever helps you sleep, buddy
XenoJazz
XenoJazz - 2/22/2026, 12:22 AM
@JackDeth - Thought you were bored?? Go bitch somewhere else.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 2/22/2026, 12:37 AM
@XenoJazz - It's so funny when people can't stand not getting the last word. lol
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/21/2026, 2:29 PM
Cameron called him on his bullshit. Sarandos is displaying classic narcissist behaviour here.

Also Sarandos is the only one who has been given a chance to control the narrative on the studio lot by making some big bullshit speech that amazingly has actually fooled a lot of Warner employees.
Cameron's just pointing out that every lie Netflix is making is in direct opposition to their actual views which they have stated in the past over and over again. So what he's suddenly changed? He's seen three ghosts in the night? Gimme a break.

Netflix never needed Warner Bros distribution model. Knives Out 2 Glass Onion was playing in cinemas just fine without them and making money but Netflix chose to pull it because they have no interest in making money that way.

They're myopically focused on their streaming model and that's exactly why they're the biggest streamer on the planet. They WILL happily leave money on the table if it doesn't fit their streaming model.

They don't want to get into the theatrical business any more than they want to get into the farming business. It's not their business. They don't care that there's all that farming money left on the table because they now own a studio lot.

Jobs will be lost. No matter who takes over jibs will be lost. Lots and lots of jobs. HBO Max is [frick]ed.

Look at their heads of department. They won't change. Dan Lin will remain in charge. There's no need for separate subdivisions. That's just not how Netflix do things. No Mike and Amy, no James and Peter just Dan. That's all they need. Dan and a head of animation, a couple more heads and the algorithm. That's all they'll ever need.

At least with Paramount it'll be more like Disney. Again there will be layoffs there will be less movies, there will be blood. But at least Paramount will keep the separate studios with separate heads. And they'll for sure keep HBO Max.
PapaSpank54
PapaSpank54 - 2/21/2026, 2:50 PM
>James Cameron
>Humble
MuadDib
MuadDib - 2/21/2026, 2:53 PM
I agree both are bad options and I wish WB had made better decisions over the years which would have prevented their initial acquisition by AT&T which really was the beginning of this downward spiral. At this point they’ve dug themselves in a hole, and the best outcome would be Comcast or even Apple coming in to save the day, but I think that’s super unlikely at this late date.

I gotta say, as much as I dislike the Ellisons, Paramount would be a better more traditional fit. Everything Netflix touches is shit, al they seem to care about is immediate gratification and I just don’t see them prioritizing the theater or cinema experience in anyway. They are all about the at home experience.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 2/21/2026, 3:54 PM
@MuadDib - Ask Javier Bardem if the Ellisons are good for the industry.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 2/21/2026, 3:25 PM
The best case is for the corrupt DOJ to deny the merger, Netflix pays 7bn? For the debacle and we go back to noting changing. The bonus being Netflix stuck in the mud with egg on their face
bobevanz
bobevanz - 2/21/2026, 3:26 PM
WB getting free money and free publicity before another +4bn year is legendary in itself
MarvelZombie616
MarvelZombie616 - 2/21/2026, 3:46 PM
Paramount is a film studio making movies since 1912.
It is the only movie studio that still has a lot in Hollywood.

Everybody who thinks he knows that Paramount is evil can kiss my ass.

Netflix on the other hand is pure evil.
If a show or movie isn't making money, it is cancelled and not viewable anymore.

Also: No DVDS, no Blurays, no Downloads.

Fuück everyone who likes Netflix.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 2/21/2026, 3:52 PM
@MarvelZombie616 - David Ellison owns Paramount now. Look him up. He's a real piece of work. Also, he's not helping the industry by pushing his political agenda on creative. He's actively censoring and even black-balling actors and directors with a 'left-leaning' political affiliation.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/21/2026, 5:18 PM
@MarvelZombie616 - It's all because of David Ellison's vague connection to Trump. David Ellison doesn't even own Paramount, his son Larry does. That's like saying Annapurna is evil because his daughter Megan owns it. Annapurna is as legit as A24. Cool director friendly indie movies. Children are not their parents.

Also there are people saying that Paramount will be too right leaning, meanwhile Paramount's Star Trek shows are all being accused of being woke. How is that too far right leaning?! lol

Netflix meanwhile is thought of as left leaning and woke. Believe me, Netflix is neither left nor right. They have no soul, they'll do whatever the algorithm requires. This soullessness is their only actual identity. Everything they do seems empty, like a soulless corpse, a copy of a copy of a copy.

Warners will be like a dead wife that Netflix pretends is still alive, but it will always be obvious that Warners is dead and is being paraded around on strings like some macabre puppet show.

No matter what happens Warners is gonna die in some respect. It will lose it's identity. But at least with Paramount it will be respected. Paramount may be different to Warners, but the ways in which it is similar are of great importnace:
It's an old buddy from the golden age of Hollywood. A brother in arms that will take on the responsibility of the ashes of it's fallen friend.

Kinda like Disney with Fox, also two classic studios. Fox's identity died with it, but Disney honors it by changing it's name but keeping the studio.

This is where Warners belongs. I think people on the lot need to come to terms with the fact that no matter who buys Warners, it will be the end of Warners having it's own identity.

But it belongs with it's brother, not with the hideous zombie robot pretending to be a movie studio.
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 2/21/2026, 8:27 PM
@MarvelZombie616 - 100%

Im proud i havent seen Stranger things, Squid Game and Kpop demon hunters and lowkey laugh at sheep idiots who always bring them to conversations with me
Floke
Floke - 2/22/2026, 3:58 AM
@vectorsigma - Woa that is awesome! Such a based edgelord! 🤘
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder