The Batman Part II Star Robert Pattinson Reveals Why He Won't Play Batman In James Gunn's DCU

The Batman Part II Star Robert Pattinson Reveals Why He Won't Play Batman In James Gunn's DCU

The Batman star Robert Pattinson has revealed why he won't play the DCU's Batman for James Gunn, confirming that he believes it would be "tough" for his Dark Knight to enter that lighter world.

By JoshWilding - Sep 24, 2026 11:09 AM EST
Filed Under: The Batman 2
Source: LADbible

Nearly four years after DC Studios announced its DCU slate, The Brave and the Bold appears no closer to becoming a reality. Understandably, that's led to speculation that Robert Pattinson's Dark Knight will be folded into the same world as Superman and Lanterns.

The latter series arguably proves that Matt Reeves' The Batman franchise could be retroactively added to the DCU, and James Gunn has gone back and forth on the possibility in interviews. Reeves seems less keen, and now Pattinson himself has shut it down.

After all, it's pretty difficult to imagine this version of Batman fighting alongside characters like Superman, Guy Gardner, and Lobo. In fact, it's the difference in tone that's proving the biggest sticking point for Pattinson. 

Asked by LADbible what sort of impact his Batman would have on the DCU—which includes his Primetime co-star Skyler Gisondo as Jimmy Olsen—the actor replied that he'd "make the other characters more serious."

Adding that it's an "interesting" possibility, Pattinson said, "I think it would be kind of tough to have this version of Bruce outside of that world. It's one of the only characters, I guess, because of the length of the shoots, but also it's such a specific kind of [style], the tone of it gets inside you."

"I remember that happened to me the last time I did it, it took a while. You’re just in the dark, the whole time. Both mood-wise and light-wise, I can't see anything for like months," he continued. "It does affect you like you feel strange afterwards." 

Pattinson later pointed out, "It’s so funny, because Gotham is Watford. It’s a shed in Watford. There’s something so destabilising about when you're just, you're in the dark the whole time.  mean just for eight months in the dark and you literally have no conception of being connected to anything in the world. [It's] difficult to even maintain your sanity."

The door appears well and truly closed on the idea that this version of Batman might somehow be added to the DCU. The actor clearly doesn't believe his version of the hero would fit into Gunn's vision for the DC Universe and likely wouldn't want to make a decade-plus commitment of appearing in multiple DC movies and TV shows. 

What does this mean for The Brave and the Bold? Well, the DCU's Batman movie remains in active development—we think—with Christina Hodson writing the script for The Flash director Andy Muschietti.

Directed by Matt Reeves from a script by him and Mattson Tomlin, The Batman Part II stars Robert Pattinson, Scarlett Johansson, Sebastian Stan, Colin Farrell, Andy Serkis, Jeffrey Wright, Charles Dance, Jayme Lawson, Gil Perez-Abraham, Sebastian Koch, and Brian Tyree Henry. 

The Batman Part II is set to be released in theaters on February 18, 2028.

About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
A lifelong comic book fan who grew up on Spider-Man: The Animated Series in the '90s, Josh Wilding has been contributing to ComicBookMovie.com since 2009.

While he's also written for websites like Batman-News, HeyUGuys, and WhatCulture, Josh is CBM's Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and the site's #1 contributor with nearly two decades of experience covering film and TV news (including interviews with Tom Holland, Chris Pratt, Gary Oldman, Halle Berry, Jon Bernthal, Tom Welling, and hundreds more).

Based in the UK with his wife, Josh is also an avid WWE and Formula 1 fan and writes about those passions on CBM's sister sites, TheRingReport.com and FullThrottleHQ.com. Favourite superhero? Spider-Man. Favourite pro wrestler? CM Punk. Favourite F1 driver? Max Verstappen.
The Batman 2 Star Robert Pattinson Says Matt Reeves' Sequel Is A Real Left Turn From The First
Related:

The Batman 2 Star Robert Pattinson Says Matt Reeves' Sequel Is A "Real Left Turn From The First"

The Batman Part II New Look Revealed As Matt Reeves Celebrates Batman Day
Recommended For You:

The Batman Part II New Look Revealed As Matt Reeves Celebrates Batman Day

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, Comic Book Movie is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. Comic Book Movie will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that Comic Book Movie, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
krayzeman
krayzeman - 9/24/2026, 11:46 AM
Stop with this tone shit as an excuse to have other characters not integrate. That makes no sense! Batman has had dark tonal stories in comics for decades now yet THE SAME CHARCTER is a Justice League memeber. The guy wears a Batsuit for crying out loud. The tone excuse the try to make on these things are ridiculous. Didnt they just fit Guy Gardener in a dark as hell Lanterns show? The SAME character that was in the bright silly Superman movie? Excuses excuses. Just say you dont want to be a part of Gunns verse and I'm fine with that but I'm tire of the tone shit...
PS118
PS118 - 9/24/2026, 12:02 PM
@krayzeman - THANK YOU
nibs
nibs - 9/24/2026, 12:16 PM
@krayzeman - he's lying and just doesn't want to be stuck in terrible movies
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 9/24/2026, 12:19 PM
@krayzeman - yeah. Iron Man and Thor were tonally different too, yet worked great together in Avengers. Moreover, never could I have imagined Endgame work in the same universe as Iron Man 2. Yet here we are
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 9/24/2026, 12:21 PM
@krayzeman - Well, I'd argue the tone is fine but a time skip would be required. Hollywood is still on this origins/trilogy crap with Bats, other than whatev Snyder was doing. He could have been JL Bats by the time it happens...in 2034, lol, but I'm not sold yet.
KennKathleen
KennKathleen - 9/24/2026, 12:30 PM
@krayzeman - In Pattinson's defense- The most Batman thing to say is Batman wouldn't work in a team group.
TheNewYorkerr
TheNewYorkerr - 9/24/2026, 12:30 PM
Guy Gardner on Lanterns is STILL comic relief. LMAO stupid
KennKathleen
KennKathleen - 9/24/2026, 12:30 PM
@nibs - That works too.
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 9/24/2026, 12:31 PM
@krayzeman - he’s also talking about the effects it has on him.
MotherGooseUPus
MotherGooseUPus - 9/24/2026, 1:39 PM
@nibs - i dont blame him for noting wanting to be in them
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 9/24/2026, 1:53 PM
@krayzeman - One of the things that made the first Avengers so special was that you had all these tonally different characters meeting up. That's the fun of it. Everyone was like, "How can you have Thor in Iron Man's gounded militeristic world"? I think that worked out well. That said, I have not been a fan of what Gunn has done so far, and many would say it hasn't worked well, so I'd say keep them separate for that reason.
MrMediocre
MrMediocre - 9/24/2026, 2:55 PM
@krayzeman - yeah, except while The Batman films would maintain their Black Label vibe, when he appears in Gunn-led stuff, he'll have goofy Golden-Age references like a Batsuit for every color of the rainbow, or that bit with The Joker talking about having boners.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 9/24/2026, 3:01 PM
@TheRevelation - There would automatically be a time gap since Reeves films are set in 2022. So if a DCU Batman movie comes out two years after The Batman part II (2030) there'd already be an 8 year time gap. So he could have had all the robins at that point easy.
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 9/24/2026, 3:27 PM
@ObserverIO - Yeah, that's
my thinking but I guess Reeves has other plans it would seem. We don't get 2 Spideys, unless it's multiversal, so I don't expect Batman anytime soon. Although, I did love the time BTAS Bats and BB Bruce shushed Terry in unison. That would be cool to see live action.
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 9/24/2026, 11:47 AM
beecause James Gunn's DCU phucking sucks!!
User Comment Image
Inktown03
Inktown03 - 9/24/2026, 1:28 PM
@harryba11zack - I laughed at this longer than I should’ve, thank you.
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 9/24/2026, 2:45 PM
@harryba11zack - *until 2036.
ferf
ferf - 9/24/2026, 11:47 AM
Non of that Pattinson babble made any sense
Astroman
Astroman - 9/24/2026, 3:20 PM
@ferf - Pattinson does like a good babble and it rarely is decipherable. That said, I think he’s politely saying he doesn’t want anything to do with Gunn’s take on DC comics.
0bstreperous
0bstreperous - 9/24/2026, 11:48 AM
Both Gunn and the Batman stink
foreverintheway
foreverintheway - 9/24/2026, 11:54 AM
Matt Reeves specifically does not want his version of Batman integrated into the DCU. Both he and James Gunn have said this multiple times. It has nothing to do with what Pattinson or Gunn wants - it's Matt Reeves decision.
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 9/24/2026, 12:33 PM
@foreverintheway - I think that's right. I think Reeves' multi-film contract gives him that discretion. Another stupid decision from the prior WB administration because it limits the integration of Batman into the broader DCU.
foreverintheway
foreverintheway - 9/24/2026, 1:18 PM
@GeneralZod - At the time it made perfect sense not to pollute this version of Batman with whatever the DCEU were doing at the time. But I agree it's an issue now - Gunn said audiences would be perfectly fine with 2 different Batmans on screen but has since walked that back a bit. The slow pace of Reeves filmmaking process means it'll unfortunately be another few years of mentions and easter eggs of Batman in the DCU before he actually appears (with lines).
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 9/24/2026, 1:24 PM
@foreverintheway - agreed. I am guessing Reeves' deal is three films, and i am also guessing there is no time limit between films. There is no other explanation for the current pace.
foreverintheway
foreverintheway - 9/24/2026, 1:57 PM
@GeneralZod - Curious if his spin-off TV shows are also part of the deal or entirely separate. I liked The Penguin - but if another spin-off is going to cost us another 3-5 years before we get the final instalment I'd rather skip the show.
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 9/24/2026, 11:55 AM
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 9/24/2026, 12:26 PM
@Nomis929 - Da fuq...🙂😀😃😄😁😆😅🤣😂

Thanks for that.
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 9/24/2026, 1:27 PM
@Nomis929 - love the 1939 Bat villains!
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 9/24/2026, 1:57 PM
@GeneralZod - Have you sen those series of videoes? They are hilarious but stil respecful to the comic creators. when AI is used like this, i really appreciate it!

Have you seen this one? It's from a company called SWFX. The do Ai videos of movies and shows that we wished we'd had got. This is one they are doing where Supergirl (Helen Slater) meet upwith Superman (Christpoher reeve). i was blown away by this and got a bit teary eyed.




ClarkJoeKent
ClarkJoeKent - 9/24/2026, 11:56 AM
James Gunn has proven he has no reverence for these characters. So glad his contract EXPIRES in 2027 & Paramount merger is DONE! Heads will ROLL!
Nonameforme
Nonameforme - 9/24/2026, 2:36 PM
@ClarkJoeKent - that's weird
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 9/24/2026, 3:08 PM
@Nonameforme - There's always the MCU. Starjammers ftw.
ClarkJoeKent
ClarkJoeKent - 9/24/2026, 3:16 PM
@Nonameforme - Gunn contract expireing being weird? COPE-A-MANIA😂😂😂😂
Nonameforme
Nonameforme - 9/24/2026, 4:31 PM
@ClarkJoeKent - Using the words cope a mania is weird.
EducatedDefense
EducatedDefense - 9/24/2026, 12:03 PM
HEADLINE:“The Batman Part II Star Robert Pattinson Reveals Why He Won't Play Batman In James Gunn's DCU.”

CONTENT:“Asked… what sort of impact his Batman would have on the DCU—the actor replied that he'd ‘make the other characters more serious.’”

So clearly Robert Pattinson DOESN’T reveal why he won’t play Batman in James Gunn’s DCU. (“Tough” is a challenge, it’s not a no.) And yet, for SOME reason (clickbait-cough-clickbait), that appears to be the headline of this “article.”

Ah, how the mystery doth unfold!
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 9/24/2026, 3:12 PM
@EducatedDefense - New headline:
'The Batman Part II Star Robert Pattinson Says His Batman In James Gunn's DCU Is An "Interesting" Possibility'
EducatedDefense
EducatedDefense - 9/24/2026, 3:54 PM
@JoshWilding - I’m just curious, does THIS constitute an example of unwarranted negativity or would you just file this under misleading. Maybe we could call it both! 😃

Seems other commenters agree, btw! But of course, nothing to see here, right? lol
Nolanite
Nolanite - 9/24/2026, 12:13 PM
Haven't we heard this before?

I think we have but I don't remember.

Oh yeah we have...like 100x before.

Nolanite out
NGFB
NGFB - 9/24/2026, 12:14 PM
Quit yer bitchin Pattinson. Watford is just outside London. I'm sure you get out if you really wanted to.
ModHaterSLADE
ModHaterSLADE - 9/24/2026, 12:15 PM
I agree with him. The guy is a great Batman, but I just don't see this take on Batman working in Gunn's more comic-inspired universe🤷🏾‍♂️
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder