COMICS: The Adventures Of 'Agent Carter' Continue In OPERATION: S.I.N. #3 Preview

Still shitty art.

@GliderMan

Boom.

Not everyone can be Alex Ross

UHHHH YEAH IM GOING TO PASS ON THIS

@JoshWilding

Do you like money? Of course you do! You can make an article out of what Peter David said about Jason Momoa's Aquaman.

quote:

"I’ve been hanging out on AICN for a few days since the first display of the Zack Snyder Aquaman picture. AICN has been hostility central as fans are complaining about how he looks nothing like Aquaman (apparently having forgotten when I wrote the character when he looks more or less exactly like that.)

And as fans continue to declare loudly that everything Hollywood produces is garbage, it made me wonder the following:

What the hell are they doing here?

I mean, I think that–for instance–everything that Fox News says deserves advance contempt, based on their indisputable track record of lying. So you’ll never find me on the Fox News website spouting hatred, because since I deplore them, I simply don’t bother with them.

Yet here are all these people who have nothing but contempt for what Hollywood produces, hanging out on a website that is essentially nothing but one big promotional device for those very films that they despise. They come there to bitch and piss and moan about everything. It’s like Red Sox fans frequenting the Yankees website. Any reasonable individual would look upon these actions and wonder why in hell they are wasting their time at a site that is going to bring them nothing but anger and frustration.

This attitude would prompt said reasonable individual to think that the lot of they are actually full of crap. That no matter how much they say they despise everything that Hollywood turns out, the fact is that actually they support every film that they bitch about. That they turn up there, not to express genuine contempt for Hollywood, but simply to posture (mostly from anonymity) and prance about with their oh-so-cool disdain for motion pictures and television while secretly supporting the films that they so despise.

The fact is, I believe, that they all think they’re too cool to be fans. That to express genuine excitement and support would remove the edge they aspire to as a self-designated truth sayer in a world gone mad.

Except they all know they’re not. Bitch and piss and moan all they want; they’ll still be there opening day. As will I, most likely.

But at least I won’t be a hypocrite about it.

PAD"

Source: http://www.peterdavid.net

That art is awesome.

SHIELD origins. Nice cover !!!

I enjoy a lot the TV series. It´s getting more and more interesting plot on every chapter

And Miss Atwell the first female MARVEL lead character is a beautiful and wonderfull actress

This is MARVEL!!

@yingyangpalms

"And 10-15 years from now, whatever DCCU films WB creates in the next few years will suffer the same fate. "

It's unfortunate that 10-15 years need to pass, as it's blatantly obvious today. Peter David is also impossibly wrong; silence is compliance.

"Yes, “Man of Steel” was a flawed film. Y’know what? It was still 100% better than Superman III and IV."

Better? It wasn't even a Superman film. It used the names of the characters in the comics, but that's about it.

The VFX were about as impressive as Superman IV, I'll give it that, all things being relative that is. Nothing impressive, or interesting.
One of the most boring action films ever released, If we're being honest.

I'm back...

Yeah, that art is absolutely terrible.

This storyline is terrible, but I'll keep reading it because I love the art so much.

What idiot would spend $3.99 a issue for this garage? I'm sure Marvel will claim that they created because "we demanded it!". Who they fooling?

@rabid

I'm not the average fanboy, with the typical complaints, you can put your claws away.
Snyder thinks Superman is a self loathing human, born differently. He's devoid of maturity and wisdom. He's angsty, and vengeful, both qualities painfully obvious long before the neck snapping scene.

These are not the qualities of Superman.

Removing the love triangle is also a huge mistake.

Maybe what fans want these days is an old testament Hero, maybe he needs to be angry and vengeful, because a million little kids didn't grow up to be rock stars like mommy and daddy said they would. Maybe it's the millennial's entitlement that demands a hero as hopelessly awkward and faltering as they are, a hero who thinks the world owes him something.

Snyder's Superman was only concerned with himself, which means he's not Superman.
Take away the values of a character, and the character is lost.

You might look back on the 1977 film as old and dated, unimpressive Special effects, etc, but Reeves understood who he was meant to play.
Snyder missed it by a mile.

Snyder's Superman covered his first week on the job, so you're expecting too much too soon. And the "love triangle" is too ridiculous for this century. Glasses are no sort of disguise.