DC May Have Finally Figured Out What Superhero TV Is Missing

DC May Have Finally Figured Out What Superhero TV Is Missing

Take a relatively niche DC character, make the show as a serious HBO crime drama, and get an audience approaching the biggest Marvel streaming

Editorial Opinion
By Baf - Sep 09, 2026 01:09 PM EST
Filed Under: Lanterns
Source: TheWrap + Variety + Disney's own release

There is something almost perverse about what Lanterns is doing.

Take one of DC's most recognizable but still relatively unproven live-action properties, strip away the expectation that a superhero show needs to be a nonstop parade of costumes, CGI and universe-shaking battles, then turn it into something that feels closer to an HBO crime drama than a traditional comic-book series.

Somehow, people are showing up in enormous numbers.

By its third episode, Lanterns was attracting 10 million global viewers in its first three days, including 7 million in the United States. That's up from 9.3 million globally and 6.6 million domestically for the premiere.

Those numbers are impressive on their own.

What makes them considerably more interesting is back in 2023, Loki Season 2 premiered to 10.9 million global views in three days on Disney+.

Read that again.

By Episode 3, Lanterns is operating in roughly the same neighborhood as Marvel's most successful Disney+ characters, Loki. Bear in mind, this Tom Hiddleston character was introduced more than a decade earlier in the Marvel Cinematic Universe and subsequently featured in Thor, The Avengers, Avengers: Infinity War, Avengers: Endgame and his own first-season streaming hit.

Lanterns doesn't have that advantage.

It has Green Lantern, and a murder investigation.

That's the fascinating part.

The superhero show that doesn't really feel like a superhero show

The genius of Lanterns may be that it doesn't seem particularly interested in proving how many superheroes it can cram into an hour.

Instead, it wants to tell a story.

The mythology is there, obviously. The rings are there. The cosmic elements are there. The larger DC universe is lurking in the background.

However, the storytelling doesn't make “being a superhero” the story itself. Instead, it showcases a much more familiar detective, evidence, secrets, damaged people, suspicious deaths and two very different investigators trying to figure out what the hell is going on.

It's True Detective wearing a Green Lantern ring, and that distinction matters.

For years, the assumption surrounding superhero television has been that the way to make these properties successful is to make them bigger. Bigger villains. Bigger battles. Bigger universes. More characters. More references.

Lanterns is making a different argument:

What if you make it better instead?

What if the superhero mythology is the setting rather than the entire point?

What if viewers don't have to be comic-book obsessives to become invested?

What if somebody can sit down knowing virtually nothing about Green Lantern and simply think, This is a damn good mystery?

That could be a much more important development for DC than another giant superhero spectacle.

And then there are those numbers

The audience trajectory is arguably more significant than the raw total.

The premiere delivered 9.3 million global viewers in its first three days.

Episode 3 delivered 10 million.

That's approximately a 7.5% increase over the same three-day measurement window.

In the United States, the increase was from 6.6 million to 7 million—roughly 6% growth.

That isn't the typical story we hear about streaming television, where the premiere generates the biggest burst of curiosity and subsequent episodes gradually lose viewers.

People aren't merely sampling Lanterns.

So far, more people appear to be joining the party.

That is precisely the kind of behavior HBO and DC should want to see.

It suggests word of mouth may be doing some of the marketing work.

Someone watches the first episode. They tell someone else. That person catches up. The conversation grows. Episode 3 becomes an event rather than simply another installment.

That's how television hits used to happen.

And it's increasingly rare.

The Loki comparison is even more revealing

There is an important caveat here: Loki ultimately demonstrated that Marvel could sustain, and even increase its audience as Season 2 progressed.

Disney reported that the Season 2 finale generated 11.2 million global views in its first three days, slightly above the 10.9 million generated by the premiere. Disney also said every Season 2 episode surpassed 11 million views during its premiere week.

So the argument isn't that Lanterns is doing something Loki never accomplished.

The interesting point is how quickly it is getting there.

Loki had an enormous built-in advantage. Marvel had spent years turning the character into a cultural phenomenon.

Lanterns is building an audience around a property whose live-action history is considerably less secure.

And it is doing so without leaning primarily on nostalgia for a decade of blockbuster movies.

That is a very different kind of success.

This could be the real DCU experiment

Which brings us to the bigger question.

Maybe the most important thing about Lanterns isn't Green Lantern at all.

Maybe it's the format.

James Gunn and DC Studios have talked repeatedly about creating a connected universe in which different kinds of stories can coexist. Lanterns is perhaps the clearest test yet of whether audiences will actually accept that idea.

This isn't simply: "Here is another superhero show."

It's: "Here is a detective drama. By the way, the detectives are Green Lanterns."

That is a much more interesting proposition.

It opens the door to a DC universe in which every project doesn't have to feel like the same product wearing a different costume.

A Batman project can be a crime thriller, a Superman project can be an optimistic science-fiction adventure, and a Green Lantern project can be a murder mystery.

The connective tissue doesn't have to be tone. It can be character and mythology.

If audiences respond to that, DC suddenly has something Marvel has spent years demonstrating: the ability to turn its enormous comic-book library into multiple genres of television rather than one endlessly repeating superhero formula.

The biggest takeaway

There is a tendency to look at streaming numbers and immediately ask which show is "winning."

That's probably the wrong question here.

The more interesting question is what kind of television audiences are willing to watch.

Lanterns is making a pretty compelling case that viewers don't necessarily need another CGI-heavy superhero spectacle.

They might just want a damn good story.

Give them compelling characters. Give them a mystery. Give them atmosphere. Give them actors they want to watch. Give them a world that feels lived-in.

If Lanterns can keep growing from here, DC may have stumbled onto something far more valuable than another successful comic-book series. DC may have found a formula for making superheroes feel new again.

And that is the real lesson: you don't have to make the superhero universe bigger to make people care about it. Sometimes you just have to make the story good enough that they forget they're watching a superhero show at all.

About The Author:
Baf
Member Since 12/15/2010
Lanterns Spoilers Reveal When The Show's Timeline Permanently Returns To 2026
Related:

Lanterns Spoilers Reveal When The Show's Timeline Permanently Returns To 2026

Lanterns Star Garret Dillahunt On His Bizarre Episode 4 Nude Scene: I Thought Those Days Were Long Past
Recommended For You:

Lanterns Star Garret Dillahunt On His Bizarre Episode 4 Nude Scene: "I Thought Those Days Were Long Past"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, Comic Book Movie is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. Comic Book Movie will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that Comic Book Movie, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

rebellion
rebellion - 9/9/2026, 1:30 PM
they haven't.
CyberNigerian
CyberNigerian - 9/9/2026, 1:36 PM
It's damn good TV.

The haters also tune in religiously every week to complain about never watching the show again, only to come back every Sunday.

Rare event.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 9/9/2026, 2:14 PM
@CyberNigerian - you are absolutely correct. The show deviated from GL mythology a bit, but it keenly touches on several comicbook storyline in a semi-realistic way.
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 9/9/2026, 2:46 PM
@lazlodaytona - True, I wonder if Jon even needs a ring. And, yes...that's in the comics too before any self-proclaimed comics fans come at me.
PatientXero
PatientXero - 9/9/2026, 1:38 PM
I think it’s a very good TV show. I’m enjoying it a lot.
AgentofSH1ELD
AgentofSH1ELD - 9/9/2026, 1:42 PM
This is the point. What I said after episode 1.
Kevin Feige, James Gunn, Peter Safran and even Zack Snyder (who seemingly fueled this type of storytelling) should all get together and watch this show. They would all learn a great deal from it.
Its similar to "The Winter Soldier" affect or Matt Reeves Batman.
Its written and portrayed in a way that is real world, grounded and identifiable.
This is what people want. This type of storytelling always out guns the others.
elcapitan
elcapitan - 9/9/2026, 2:02 PM
@AgentofSH1ELD - Lanterns is essentially EP 1 of Agatha All Along with Green Lanterns instead of witches.
Nomi
Nomi - 9/9/2026, 2:36 PM
@elcapitan - so you have not watched this show
MisterBones
MisterBones - 9/9/2026, 1:47 PM
Netflix Daredevil is still paramount. I think it figured out what superhero tv was missing long ago.

And another Marvel show that often does not get its flowers did the same: Agents of Shield.

Once it got to its mid to late seasons it didn't shy away from the comicbooky elements but expertly utilized and implemented them with maturity and respect. That was a quite adult and self assured show that wasn't ashamed of its source material. And it had seasons and periods where it was a thriller, an espionage show, a horror property damn near.
User Comment Image

Lanterns is still a good show; though I do wish it did delve into the cosmic more. A season 2 with a little Star Trek energy. Some off world tales.
pucrepeap
pucrepeap - 9/9/2026, 2:41 PM
@MisterBones - You are right, we have already had a fair amount of quality superhero shows. Daredevil is the gold standard. Jessica Jones season 1 was great as well. And I will echo you with how good Agents of Shield was in the mid to late seasons. Fitz-Simmons dynamic one of my favorites. And even named my dogs Coulson and Mack.

TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 9/9/2026, 2:48 PM
@MisterBones - AOS was great, it just was a victim of studio politickin/infighting, between TV and film.
MisterBones
MisterBones - 9/9/2026, 2:51 PM
@TheRevelation - exactly. It was a legitimately great show. An all timer comic book show that never gets its just due.
Baf
Baf - 9/9/2026, 3:13 PM
@MisterBones - In my research, AOS came up a lot. It was a monster in numbers. My point was to only compare streaming properties because I felt adding network shows didn't compare well.
krayzeman
krayzeman - 9/9/2026, 1:50 PM
I usually don't respect the opinion articles posted here but this is some damn good analysis! The Arrowverse at it's height worked great on TV its just didnt have the budget to justify some of its antics and it petered out at the end. Watching Lanterns I'm forgetting there a whole universe being serviced in the movies that this will connect to! John Stewart will have such great context in Man of Tomorrow all because of how well done he's being depicted on the show. Just make it good! And maybe being on HBO Sunday night's reinforces that quality. Also maybe instead of getting a solo Green Lantern film they just open the world up to a Green Lantern Corp movie that services all the aliens shit that can be budgeted on a big screen. They're laying so much groundwork in Lanterns they don't need to do a lot of explaining come movie time! Good article!
Baf
Baf - 9/9/2026, 2:02 PM
@krayzeman - Thank You! just wanted to spread some positivity.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 9/9/2026, 2:17 PM
@krayzeman - this is a fantastic post.
Thank you
Lucasberg
Lucasberg - 9/9/2026, 1:52 PM
Nicely put together article.

However, Marvel Studios discovered this fact about Superhero media at least a decade ago with Winter Soldier and Guardians of the Galaxy. I distinctly remember Feige articulating something about "good superhero movies should more just be like a good political thriller movie, or a good space adventure etc." - this is what actually made the MCU into a monster success in my opinion (even though the MCU leadership team forgot this fact and became painfully formulaic and more agenda driven for a bit following Endgame e.g. Thor Love and Thunder, Doctor Strange 2 etc.).

People will always respond positively to soundly conceived stories that come together like a puzzle. Looks like Lanterns is going to succeed at that sort of thing - even though they are forcing some obnoxious feminist lecturing along the way (eyeroll emoji here).

nibs
nibs - 9/9/2026, 1:54 PM
funny coincidence, I just finished Loki Season 2 and it was probably the worst season of any tv show Ive ever seen
Tensorpants
Tensorpants - 9/9/2026, 1:55 PM
Tell a good story with compelling characters and it's successful, imagine that.
elcapitan
elcapitan - 9/9/2026, 1:59 PM
ChatGPT, write an article examining why Lanterns is a hit on HBO.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 9/9/2026, 2:19 PM
@elcapitan - absolutely!
pucrepeap
pucrepeap - 9/9/2026, 2:25 PM
@elcapitan - yup... can't unsee it now.
MattWithoutFear
MattWithoutFear - 9/9/2026, 2:31 PM
@elcapitan - it's so blatant as well. Pure AI-nalysis
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 9/9/2026, 2:03 PM
There’s a weird notion amongst people that super hero media can’t be… super hero media. I hate that and I hate that people believe they have to be grounded to be taken seriously. But whatever
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 9/9/2026, 2:20 PM
@MyCoolYoung - I think grounded to a point with superhero stuff being the thick icing on the cake

Not Nol a n Batman. But probably Tim Burton Batman '89
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 9/9/2026, 2:46 PM
@lazlodaytona - I think whatever the story needs to be good, but I just don’t want a bunch of people ashamed of the genre.

The winter soldier is technically grounded I guess but it has flying helicarriers talking about killing 1000s at a time. I’m not even big on action or anything but don’t be afraid of color or fantastical aspects.
Magus
Magus - 9/9/2026, 2:50 PM
@MyCoolYoung - I definitely fall on the side off wanting my comic book movie content to not be ashamed of the comics and that celebrate the absurdity. The grounded dad movie version to me often feels outdated and uninspired.

That said, now that we are mostly past the early 2000's black leather phase, it can be nice to get the occasional gritty reimagining, if it is cleverly conceived.

This show and Watchmen before it have managed to feel like a breath of fresh air while staying grounded.
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 9/9/2026, 2:52 PM
@MyCoolYoung - Yeah, I'll watch TBII when it arrives...but I'm over grounded. It's already not grounded by default. At least in olden days this was not a concern now, for some reason it is. There are reasons, sure, but even those feel like a overreaction rather than a course correction. It took Doomsday to get a proper hyper combo out of Slim smh.
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 9/9/2026, 2:04 PM
The Penguin did the same type of format.

Although it is much easier when you're only dealing with a mob family drama.
Colton
Colton - 9/9/2026, 2:06 PM
Why is this article so afraid of proper paragraphs?
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 9/9/2026, 2:17 PM
Is kanhg
pucrepeap
pucrepeap - 9/9/2026, 2:24 PM
Its ok. It really isn't as good as some make it out to be....and it isn't as bad as others make it out to be.

I personally like the look and feel. I don't like the characters. No one is likeable, and that irks me as a comic book fan. I am invested in HEROES, doing hero things.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 9/9/2026, 2:25 PM
I'm eating a cheeseburger on a date and shes having the same. We're going to my place after. Several dinner mints, 4 episodes of GL that I truly hopped we dong get through.q

User Comment Image
Mandalorian47
Mandalorian47 - 9/9/2026, 2:36 PM
I stopped watching during episode 3 because of the mother saying the father didn’t get the ring cause he’s used to being afraid in America… and cap and winter soldier, I was never more excited for a show in my life- then the last 10mins became nobody wanted me to have the shield because I’m black… I was bro!

Can we have representation as just normal humans/super humans?

Why does color get brought it?

I hope anyone who likes it continues to do so but it’s not for me and I wanted it to be with Jon.
EskimoJ
EskimoJ - 9/9/2026, 2:53 PM
@Mandalorian47 - Your loss.
DrCigarettes
DrCigarettes - 9/9/2026, 2:37 PM
What the [frick] is this blatantly AI prompted slop?

Why was this approved? It’s not hard to tell when somethings been written by AI.

Fücking morons.
Baf
Baf - 9/9/2026, 3:03 PM
@DrCigarettes - I understand the criticism, and I'm not going to pretend I didn't use AI. I did.
But I think there's a distinction between using AI to do your thinking for you and using it as a research tool. I was steering this piece from the beginning. I had the subject, I had the questions I wanted answered, the arguments I wanted to examine, and the conclusions I wanted to reach. I used AI to help me search for information, identify sources, and organize the research. I made the editorial decisions about what was relevant and what belonged in the article. It's on me if something in the article is wrong. I'm comfortable being transparent about how I used the tool. I'm not a professional writer, more of an idea guy. I still did the work.
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 9/9/2026, 2:50 PM
What? Shit writing? Nah they haven’t invented, but sure perfected it

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder